三唑
核糖核酸
外体
微泡
RNA提取
小RNA
小RNA
分离(微生物学)
分子生物学
生物
超离心机
细胞
化学
计算生物学
色谱法
细胞生物学
生物化学
基因
生物信息学
作者
Yueting Tang,Yiyao Huang,Lei Zheng,Sihua Qin,Xuping Xu,Taixue An,Yong Xu,Ying-Song Wu,Xiumei Hu,Baohong Ping,Qian Wang
标识
DOI:10.3892/ijmm.2017.3080
摘要
Exosomes are cell-derived vesicles and are abundant in biological fluids; they contain RNA molecules which may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers in 'precision medicine'. To promote the clinical application of exosomal RNA (exoRNA), many isolation methods must be compared and validated. Exosomes in cell culture medium (CCM) and serum may be isolated using ultracentrifugation (UC), ExoQuick or Total Exosome Isolation Reagent (TEI), and exoRNA may be extracted using TRIzol-LS, SeraMir, Total Exosome RNA Isolation (TER), HiPure Liquid RNA/miRNA kit (HLR), miRNeasy or exoRNeasy. ExoRNA was assessed using NanoDrop, Bioanalyzer 2100, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and high-throughput sequencing. UC showed the lowest recovery of particles, but the highest protein purity for exosome isolation. For isolation of exoRNA, we found that combinations of the TEI and TER methods resulted in high extraction efficiency and purity of small RNA obtained using CCM. High yield and a narrow size distribution pattern of small RNA were shown in exoRNA isolated by exoRNeasy from serum. In RNA profile analysis, the small RNA constituent ratio, miRNA content and amount varied as a result of methodological differences. This study showed that different methods may introduce variations in the concentration, purity and size of exosomes and exoRNA. Herein we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each method and their application to different materials, therefore providing a reference according to research design.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI