Implementation of novel measurement‐based patient‐specific QA for pencil beam scanning proton FLASH radiotherapy

Abstract Background Several studies have shown pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy is a feasible and safe modality to deliver conformal and ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) FLASH radiation therapy. However, it would be challenging and burdensome to conduct the quality assurance (QA) of the dose rate along with conventional patient‐specific QA (psQA). Purpose To demonstrate a novel measurement‐based psQA program for UHDR PBS proton transmission FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH‐RT) using a high spatiotemporal resolution 2D strip ionization chamber array (SICA). Methods The SICA is a newly designed open‐air strip‐segmented parallel plate ionization chamber, which is capable of measuring spot position and profile through 2 mm‐spacing‐strip electrodes at a 20 kHz sampling rate (50 μs per event) and has been characterized to exhibit excellent dose and dose rate linearity under UHDR conditions. A SICA‐based delivery log was collected for each irradiation containing the measured position, size, dwell time, and delivered MU for each planned spot. Such spot‐level information was compared with the corresponding quantities in the treatment planning system (TPS). The dose and dose rate distributions were reconstructed on patient CT using the measured SICA log and compared to the planned values in volume histograms and 3D gamma analysis. Furthermore, the 2D dose and dose rate measurements were compared with the TPS calculations of the same depth. In addition, simulations using different machine‐delivery uncertainties were performed, and QA tolerances were deduced. Results A transmission proton plan of 250 MeV for a lung lesion was planned and measured in a dedicated ProBeam research beamline (Varian Medical System) with a nozzle beam current between 100 to 215 nA. The worst gamma passing rates for dose and dose rate of the 2D SICA measurements (four fields) compared to TPS prediction (3%/3 mm criterion) were 96.6% and 98.8%, respectively, whereas the SICA‐log reconstructed 3D dose distribution achieved a gamma passing rate of 99.1% (2%/2 mm criterion) compared to TPS. The deviations between SICA measured log, and TPS were within 0.3 ms for spot dwell time with a mean difference of 0.069 ± 0.11 s, within 0.2 mm for spot position with a mean difference of −0.016 ± 0.03 mm in the x‐direction, and −0.036 ± 0.059 mm in the y‐direction, and within 3% for delivered spot MUs. Volume histogram metric of dose (D95) and dose rate (V 40Gy/s ) showed minimal differences, within less than 1%. Conclusions This work is the first to describe and validate an all‐in‐one measurement‐based psQA framework that can fulfill the goals of validating the dose rate accuracy in addition to dosimetric accuracy for proton PBS transmission FLASH‐RT. The successful implementation of this novel QA program can provide future clinical practice with more confidence in the FLASH application.