A Measure of Nutrition Security Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Dataset

全国健康与营养检查调查 环境卫生 粮食安全 补充营养援助计划 医学 婚姻状况 贫穷 社会经济地位 老年学 粮食不安全 农业 人口 地理 经济增长 经济 考古
作者
Vibha Bhargava,Jung Sun Lee,Travis A. Smith,Sanchita Chakrovorty
出处
期刊:JAMA network open [American Medical Association]
卷期号:8 (2): e2462130-e2462130 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62130
摘要

Importance: Accurate and practical measures of nutrition security are needed to assess and monitor its prevalence and to identify its associated risk factors in the US. Objective: To propose a nutrition security measure derived from combining self-assessed food security and diet quality indicators available in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and to assess the prevalence and associated sociodemographic and health factors of nutrition security. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from 6 cycles of NHANES, which collects data on general health status and behaviors, dietary intake, physiological measurements, and sociodemographic characteristics, conducted from 2007 to 2018. All participants were adults aged 20 years or older. Statistical analysis was performed between October 2023 and April 2024. Exposures: Sociodemographic and health characteristics, including age, sex, race and ethnicity, marital status, household size, presence of children in the household, educational level, poverty to income ratio (PIR), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation, weight status, chronic conditions, and health insurance coverage. Main Outcomes and Measures: A nutrition security measure was derived from combining self-assessed food security, measured using the US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module, and self-rated diet quality indicators. Four nutrition security status categories were created from dichotomized food security and diet quality measures: food secure with high diet quality (FSHD), food secure with low diet quality (FSLD), food insecure with high diet quality (FIHD), and food insecure with low diet quality (FILD). Only respondents classified as FSHD were considered to be nutrition secure. Results: The unweighted analytic sample included 28 898 NHANES participants. The weighted mean [SD] age of participants was 47.3 [14.5] years; 51.9% (weighted) of the sample was female; 11.1% identified as Black, 13.6% as Hispanic, and 67.4% as White individuals; and 35.6% of those surveyed were classified by the proposed measure as nutrition insecure (ie, FSLD, FIHD, or FILD). Of these participants, 20.2% (95% CI, 19.4%-21.0%) were categorized as being nutrition insecure due to FSLD, 8.4% (95% CI, 7.8%-9.1%) due to FIHD, and 7.0% (95% CI, 6.4%-7.6%) due to FILD. The remaining 64.4% (95% CI, 63.2%-65.7%) were classified as FSHD (ie, nutrition secure). Younger age (20-44 years: average marginal effect [AME], -0.193; 95% CI, -0.217 to -0.168), low income (PIR <1.30: AME, -0.111; 95% CI, -0.136 to -0.085), lower educational level (≤high school diploma: AME, -0.135; 95% CI, -0.156 to -0.114), racial and ethnic minority status (Hispanic: AME, -0.054; 95% CI, -0.075 to -0.032), SNAP participation (AME, -0.073; 95% CI, -0.099 to -0.047), obesity (AME, -0.118; 95% CI, -0.138 to -0.097), and self-reported fair or poor general health (AME, -0.239; 95% CI, -0.260 to -0.217) were factors associated with nutrition insecurity. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study proposed a feasible and practical measure for assessing and monitoring nutrition security using validated measures in the NHANES. This study laid the groundwork for exploring other national datasets and performing regular data collection of key dimensions for nutrition security assessment and monitoring in the US.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
QING完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
浮游应助cc采纳,获得10
1秒前
无极微光应助ying采纳,获得20
1秒前
Orange应助roro熊采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI6.2应助南怀采纳,获得10
2秒前
gentille完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Rosy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
镜子小子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
cc完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助韦良晨采纳,获得10
6秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
orixero应助谨慎的秋烟采纳,获得10
12秒前
五本笔记完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
隐形曼青应助拓跋世开采纳,获得10
14秒前
18秒前
baiyixuan发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Danny完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
21秒前
yfl完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
丘比特应助潺潺流水采纳,获得10
22秒前
杨武天一发布了新的文献求助20
22秒前
23秒前
24秒前
Hello应助等风的人采纳,获得10
24秒前
超级觅风发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
lin01发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
28秒前
29秒前
拓跋世开发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
roro熊发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
33秒前
CipherSage应助优美的芷天采纳,获得10
34秒前
baiyixuan完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 450
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6723930
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8459755
关于积分的说明 18059782
捐赠科研通 5977790
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2997190
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1973447
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1928153