A Comparison of Single-Incision Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children

Background: Although single-incision endoscopic splenectomy (SIES-Sp) has been shown to be feasible and safe, few have compared the SIES-Sp with multiport laparoscopic splenectomy (MPLS). The purpose of this study was to compare the two techniques in children undergoing total splenectomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all children (age <18 years) who underwent minimally invasive total splenectomy at a single tertiary referral center from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019. The primary outcome was complication rate 30 days after discharge defined by maximum Clavien–Dindo score. Secondary outcomes included conversion, operative time, hospital length of stay, postoperative pain scores, and readmission within 30 days of discharge. SIES-Sp and MPLS were compared using univariate analysis. Results: Of 48 children undergoing laparoscopic total splenectomy, 60% (n = 29) were SIES-Sp and 40% (n = 19) were MPLS. Subjects were 48% female (n = 23). Common diagnoses were idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (33% [n = 16]), hereditary spherocytosis (29% [n = 14]), and other congenital hemolytic anemias (23% [n = 11]). There were no differences in age, gender, or diagnosis between groups (all P > .05). One in three cases involved additional procedures. Spleens were smaller in both greatest dimension (13.0 cm versus 16.4 cm) and weight (156.5 g versus 240.0 g) in SIES-Sp compared with MPLS patients (both P < .05). Readmission and reoperation rates were similar (both P > .05). Complications occurred in 7% (n = 2) of SIES-Sp and in 11% (n = 2) of MPLS patients (P > .99). Severe complications included: cardiac arrest in 1 SIES-Sp patient and bleeding requiring reoperation in 1 MPLS patient. Conclusion: SIES-Sp is a safe alternative to the traditional MPLS for children. Additional procedures do not preclude a less invasive approach, but larger spleens may present a challenge.