Factors Determining Selectivity of Acid- and Base-Catalyzed Self- and Cross-Condensation of Acetone and Cyclopentanone

In a combined kinetics and density functional theory (DFT) study, we have explored several factors that affect the selectivity of acid- and base-catalyzed self- and cross-aldol condensation of acetone (ACE) and cyclopentanone (CPO). These factors include competitive adsorption, molecular structure, and electron polarization of the two ketones on the catalyst surface. Kinetic analysis shows that on MgO, self-condensation of both ACE and CPO is limited by the initial unimolecular enolization step. Accordingly, CPO exhibits a higher self-condensation rate than ACE due to the more favorable α-C–H abstraction by the basic O site. The thermodynamic parameters derived from the kinetic analysis indicate that under cross-condensation reaction conditions, the MgO surface fraction covered by CPO is significantly higher than that covered by ACE. Therefore, the product distribution is dominated by [CPO]-activated products ([CPO]CPO + [CPO]ACE). Also, for a given enolate (indicated as [CPO] or [ACE]), the higher surface coverage of CPO leads to enhanced C–C coupling with CPO as the electrophile ([CPO]CPO > [CPO]ACE; [ACE]CPO > [ACE]ACE). By contrast, for both acid catalysts investigated, the rate-limiting step is the bimolecular C–C coupling, with aspects of this step depending on the density of acid sites. That is, on the high-acid-density MCM-41-SO3H catalyst, condensation follows a bimolecular dual-site mechanism (Langmuir–Hinshelwood model). On this catalyst surface, the ACE coverage is higher than that of CPO, which causes a higher selectivity for those products in which ACE is the electrophile ([CPO]ACE > [CPO]CPO; [ACE]ACE > [ACE]CPO). Steric hindrance is another factor that affects selectivity in the same way, favoring products in which the electrophile is ACE since it presents a lower steric hindrance to C–C coupling than CPO. Therefore, the same sequence of products is obtained for the low-acid-density MCM-41-SO3H catalyst, which proceeds on a single-acid site with the other molecule in the liquid phase (Eley–Rideal model). In this case, the electrophile coverage is not relevant, but the steric hindrance is, yielding the same trend as above ([CPO]ACE > [CPO]CPO; [ACE]ACE > [ACE]CPO).