Vertical size structure is associated with productivity and species diversity in a short‐stature grassland: Evidence for the importance of height variability within herbaceous communities

Abstract Questions Local size structure is frequently measured in plant populations and forested systems due to its association with population‐ and community‐level processes. In contrast, size structure is rarely examined within herbaceous communities despite evidence for size‐dependent processes in these systems, suggesting an important functional vegetation property may be widely overlooked. Here, we test whether vertical size structure (a) varies within a short‐stature grassland, (b) varies along a productivity gradient, and (c) enhances the understanding of a foundational ecological pattern: the diversity–productivity relationship. Location Rough fescue grassland in Alberta, Canada. Methods We measured the heights of individuals within 32 plots and used average height, the Gini coefficient, and a two‐parameter Weibull distribution to estimate community‐level vertical size structure. Linear mixed models were used to test whether size structure parameters were significantly associated with productivity, species richness, and species evenness. Results Vertical size structure varied significantly among local communities, such that some were dominated by short individuals while others were comprised of a more equal number of taller individuals. With increasing productivity, there was an increase in average plant height and a decrease in height inequality. Decreased height inequality was associated with reduced species richness with evidence that loss was not size‐dependent. The inclusion of vertical size structure parameters increased the explained variance of the diversity–productivity relationship by ~35% while also increasing its parsimony. Conclusions Even within a short‐stature grassland, there is substantial functional variation in vertical size structure. Productivity is strongly associated with size structure patterns, and the inclusion of height inequalities greatly enhances productivity–diversity relationships, likely because they are the product of assembly mechanisms such as size‐asymmetric competition, assemblage‐level thinning, and niche complementarity. Overall, this demonstrates that vertical size structure has been a missing mechanism in most community assembly theories and models and should be included in the future.