清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Expanding Heart Transplants from Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD) - Results of the First Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Organ Care System (OCS™) Heart - (OCS DCD Heart Trial)

医学 循环系统 随机对照试验 心脏移植 心脏病学 重症监护医学 内科学 心力衰竭
作者
Jacob N. Schroder,A. Shah,Victor Pretorius,J.W. Smith,Mani A. Daneshmand,Arnar Geirsson,Si M. Pham,J. Um,Scott C. Silvestry,Andrew Shaffer,Karol Mudy,Masashi Kai,David L. Joyce,Jonathan M. Philpott,Koji Takeda,Daniel Goldstein,Yasuhiro Shudo,G.S. Couper,H. Mallidi,F. Esmailian,D. Pham,Christopher T. Salerno,Lucian Lozonschi,Mohammed Quader,Chetan B. Patel,Adam D. DeVore,Benjamin S. Bryner,Joren C. Madsen,Tarek Absi,C. Milano,Donna M. D’Alessandro
出处
期刊:Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:41 (4): S72-S72 被引量:18
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.165
摘要

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. Methods OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Endpoints Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. Results A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. Conclusion The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival. To evaluate the effectiveness of the OCS Heart technology to resuscitate, preserve and assess DCD hearts for transplantation. OCS DCD Heart Trial included the following donor inclusion criteria: Maastricht Category III DCD donor, donor age 18-49 years old, warm ischemic time (WIT) ≤30 mins. Donor exclusions: Previous history of cardiac surgery, coronary artery disease, cardiogenic shock, or myocardial infarction, terminal EF of ≤50%, or significant valve disease. Recipient inclusion criteria: primary adult heart transplant candidates. Recipient exclusion: multi-organ transplant candidates, history of prior solid organ or bone marrow transplants, history of chronic renal failure, or unrandomized recipients. Candidates were randomized 3:1 into two groups: DCD Heart Possible (DCD) or DBD cold stored hearts (Control). The trial protocol final analysis was prespecified to compare the post-transplant outcome from recipients of DCD hearts preserved on OCS (DCD) to all those who received DBD hearts preserved with cold storage (DBD Control). Patient survival at 6- and 12-months post-transplantation. Other endpoints included; OCS DCD hearts utilization rate defined as the number of DCD hearts transplanted after OCS perfusion divided by the total number of eligible DCD donor hearts that were instrumented on OCS, incidence of severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD. Safety endpoint was defined as the incidence of Heart Graft-related Serious Adverse Events (HGRSAEs) in the first 30 days post-transplant defined as moderate or severe left or right ventricular ISHLT PGD, or primary graft failure requiring re-transplantation. A total of 180 patients were randomized and transplanted in the trial (DCD-OCS n=90 and Control-DBD n=90) at 13 heart transplant centers in the U.S. between 2019 and 2020. There was a total of 101 DCD donor hearts instrumented on OCS Heart technology, of those 90 were transplanted for an overall DCD hearts utilization rate of 89% (90/101). Donors and Recipients' demographics and risk factors were similar between the two arms except for age (donors- DCD 29.3 ± 7.5 vs Control 33.2 ± 11.4) (recipients- DCD-OCS 51.3 ± 12.6 vs Control-DBD 55.0 ± 11.4 p=0.041). Patient survival at 6 months was DCD 94.4% vs Control 88.6% p<0.0001, and graft survival at 6 months was DCD 98.9% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Patient survival at 1 year was DCD 93.3% vs Control 87.3%, and graft survival at 1 year was DCD 97.7% vs Control 96.7% from K-M analysis. Safety endpoint was similar between both trial arms DCD 0.2 HGRSAE per patient vs Control 0.1 HGRSAE per patient. Incidence of moderate or severe ISHLT PGD was 20% in DCD arm vs. 9.1% in Control arm. Incidence of primary graft failure was 0% in the DCD arm vs 2.2% in Control. The OCS DCD Heart trial was the first ever randomized trial comparing DCD heart transplant to DBD standard criteria heart transplant clinical outcomes. The trial demonstrated that the use of OCS Heart resulted in high rate of DCD heart utilization for transplantation with excellent patient and graft survival outcomes compared to DBD donor hearts. These results support the increased use of DCD hearts for transplantation to expand the pool of donor hearts for transplantation.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Patient & Graft Survival.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
genau000完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
兼听则明完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Orange应助TEDDY采纳,获得10
5秒前
核桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
852应助予秋采纳,获得10
27秒前
丘比特应助TEDDY采纳,获得10
30秒前
小巧又菱完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
bruna应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
41秒前
酷波er应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
41秒前
Lucas应助shamiones采纳,获得10
41秒前
李健的小迷弟应助TEDDY采纳,获得10
57秒前
激动的似狮完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
Elytra发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
shamiones完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
shamiones发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
lele033086完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
重要板凳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
几一昂完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
bkagyin应助丹布里采纳,获得10
1分钟前
vbnn完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
wahj10224发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
小马甲应助jy采纳,获得10
1分钟前
眯眯眼的安雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
xiaowangwang完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
poki完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
喜悦的唇彩完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
TEDDY发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
搜集达人应助左白易采纳,获得10
2分钟前
务实的一斩完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
不安的如天完成签到,获得积分20
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
jy发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
左白易发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
3分钟前
付其喜完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
小太阳完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
忘忧Aquarius完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
chao Liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
高分求助中
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Treatment response-adapted risk index model for survival prediction and adjuvant chemotherapy selection in nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
BRITTLE FRACTURE IN WELDED SHIPS 1000
Intentional optical interference with precision weapons (in Russian) Преднамеренные оптические помехи высокоточному оружию 1000
Atlas of Anatomy 5th original digital 2025的PDF高清电子版(非压缩版,大小约400-600兆,能更大就更好了) 1000
Toughness acceptance criteria for rack materials and weldments in jack-ups 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6195677
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8022786
关于积分的说明 16696511
捐赠科研通 5290343
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2819524
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1799261
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1662150