Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and ESRD Receiving Dialysis: A 54-Week Randomized Trial

医学 磷酸西他列汀 格列吡嗪 2型糖尿病 耐受性 低血糖 内科学 磷酸西他列汀 临床终点 糖尿病 透析 肾脏疾病 终末期肾病 随机对照试验 不利影响 血液透析 内分泌学 胰岛素
作者
Juan Camilo Arjona Ferreira,Dalila B. Corry,Carl Erik Mogensen,Lance Sloan,Xu Liu,Gregory T. Golm,Edward J. Gonzalez,Michael J. Davies,Keith D. Kaufman,Barry J. Goldstein
出处
期刊:American Journal of Kidney Diseases [Elsevier]
卷期号:61 (4): 579-587 被引量:110
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.11.043
摘要

Background Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. Study Design 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. Setting & Participants From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Intervention Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Outcomes Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Results Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Limitations Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Conclusions Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis. Treatment with oral antihyperglycemic agents has not been well characterized in patients with type 2 diabetes and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The efficacy and safety of sitagliptin and glipizide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD on dialysis therapy were assessed in this study. 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm study. From 31 clinical sites in 12 countries, 129 patients 30 years or older with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were on dialysis therapy and had a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7%-9% were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment. Monotherapy with sitagliptin, 25 mg daily or glipizide (initiated with 2.5 mg daily and titrated up to a potential maximum dose of 10 mg twice daily or down to avoid hypoglycemia). Primary end points were 54-week change in HbA1c level from baseline and tolerability with sitagliptin. A secondary end point was the comparison of sitagliptin versus glipizide on the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia. Of 129 patients randomly assigned, 64 were in the sitagliptin group (mean baseline age, 61 years; HbA1c, 7.9%) and 65 were in the glipizide group (mean baseline age, 59 years; HbA1c, 7.8%). After 54 weeks, the least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c level was −0.72% (95% CI, −0.95% to −0.48%) with sitagliptin and −0.87% (95% CI, −1.11% to −0.63%) with glipizide, for a difference of 0.15% (95% CI, −0.18% to 0.49%). The incidences of symptomatic hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were 6.3% versus 10.8% (between-group difference, −4.8% [95% CI, −15.7% to 5.6%]) and 0% versus 7.7% (between-group difference, −7.8% [95% CI, −17.1% to −1.9%]) in the sitagliptin and glipizide groups, respectively. Higher incidences (ie, 95% CI around between-treatment difference excluded 0) of cellulitis and headache were found with sitagliptin compared to glipizide (6.3% vs 0%, respectively, for both). Small sample size limits between-group comparisons. Treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide monotherapy was effective and well tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes and ESRD who were receiving dialysis.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wl123456发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
huhuhu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
柊巳完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
冷静硬币发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
白金发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
打打应助刘家成采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
Echo1完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Akim应助最爱学习的亚子采纳,获得10
14秒前
英俊的铭应助huhuhu采纳,获得10
14秒前
加菲丰丰应助promise0429采纳,获得30
16秒前
18秒前
当芎芍地完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
甜田完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
脑洞疼应助eva采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
27秒前
29秒前
29秒前
刘家成发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
wodetouhenda发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
领导范儿应助机灵的雁蓉采纳,获得10
33秒前
35秒前
35秒前
35秒前
徐杨她爹发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
隐形的大有完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
37秒前
38秒前
JamesPei应助甜甜盼夏采纳,获得10
38秒前
Echosansan完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
巴啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
41秒前
蝴蝶发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
Ava应助小伊001采纳,获得10
43秒前
45秒前
高分求助中
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 1000
Corrosion and Oxygen Control 600
Python Programming for Linguistics and Digital Humanities: Applications for Text-Focused Fields 500
Love and Friendship in the Western Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernity 500
Heterocyclic Stilbene and Bibenzyl Derivatives in Liverworts: Distribution, Structures, Total Synthesis and Biological Activity 500
重庆市新能源汽车产业大数据招商指南(两链两图两池两库两平台两清单两报告) 400
Division and square root. Digit-recurrence algorithms and implementations 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2549707
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2176999
关于积分的说明 5607542
捐赠科研通 1897873
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 947431
版权声明 565447
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 504108