A Comparative Study on the Efficiency of Clear Aligners Versus Conventional Braces in Adult Orthodontic Patients

A BSTRACT Background: Orthodontic treatment in adults has gained popularity with the advent of clear aligners as an alternative to conventional braces. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 adult patients requiring orthodontic treatment were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups: 50 patients were treated with clear aligners (Group A) and 50 with conventional braces (Group B). The treatment duration, number of visits, and patient satisfaction were recorded. The primary outcome measured was the alignment of teeth, assessed using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index at baseline and after 12 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes included the duration of treatment and patient-reported discomfort. Results: After 12 months of treatment, Group A (clear aligners) showed a 75% reduction in the PAR index, while Group B (conventional braces) showed an 80% reduction. The average treatment duration was 14.5 months for Group A and 16.2 months for Group B. Patient satisfaction was higher in Group A, with 85% of patients reporting high satisfaction compared to 65% in Group B. Discomfort levels were lower in Group A, with a mean score of 2.3 on a 10-point scale, compared to 5.6 in Group B. Conclusion: Clear aligners and conventional braces are both effective in achieving desired orthodontic outcomes in adults. However, clear aligners offer a shorter treatment duration, lower discomfort levels, and higher patient satisfaction, making them a preferable option for adult orthodontic patients.