过度自信效应
斯科普斯
荟萃分析
构造(python库)
投资(军事)
心理学
实证研究
出版偏见
引用
精算学
社会心理学
经济
政治学
计算机科学
梅德林
统计
医学
数学
法学
政治
内科学
程序设计语言
作者
Jitender Kumar,Neha Prince
标识
DOI:10.1177/23197145231174344
摘要
The current study uses a systematic literature review to summarize and highlight studies on overconfidence bias in investment decision-making. More specifically, the study synthesizes the overconfidence literature highlighting the year of publication, country of the published articles, research methods, data sources, prominent theories, statistical techniques, citation analysis of the popular articles and authors and future research topics. The authors study 111 documents indexed in Scopus and/or Web of Science databases to recognize research trends regarding overconfidence bias during the last 29 years (1995–2023). The results indicate that most (61.26%) selected studies are empirical. Likewise, secondary data-based articles dominate primary ones. Additionally, the resulting factors can be classified into four themes: the construct of overconfidence bias and investments; success: a cause of overconfidence; gender and overconfidence; and the consequences of overconfidence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is a unique article in which research outcomes of essential aspects of overconfidence are skimmed systematically.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI