A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials

危险系数 统计 对数秩检验 比例危险模型 数学 生存分析 危害 无效假设 事件(粒子物理) 计量经济学 I类和II类错误 蒙特卡罗方法 价值(数学) 置信区间 物理 化学 有机化学 量子力学
作者
Sirui Zheng,Duolao Wang,Junshan Qiu,Tao Chen,Margaret Gamalo
出处
期刊:Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics [Informa]
卷期号:33 (4): 488-501 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1080/10543406.2023.2170393
摘要

Many clinical trials include time-to-event or survival data as an outcome. To compare two survival distributions, the log-rank test is often used to produce a P-value for a statistical test of the null hypothesis that the two survival curves are identical. However, such a P-value does not provide the magnitude of the difference between the curves regarding the treatment effect. As a result, the P-value is often accompanied by an estimate of the hazard ratio from the proportional hazards model or Cox model as a measurement of treatment difference. However, one of the most important assumptions for Cox model is that the hazard functions for the two treatment groups are proportional. When the hazard curves cross, the Cox model could lead to misleading results and the log-rank test could also perform poorly. To address the problem of crossing curves in survival analysis, we propose the use of the win ratio method put forward by Pocock et al. as an estimand for analysing such data. The subjects in the test and control treatment groups are formed into all possible pairs. For each pair, the test treatment subject is labelled a winner or a loser if it is known who had the event of interest such as death. The win ratio is the total number of winners divided by the total number of losers and its standard error can be estimated using Bebu and Lachin method. Using real trial datasets and Monte Carlo simulations, this study investigates the power and type I error and compares the win ratio method with the log-rank test and Cox model under various scenarios of crossing survival curves with different censoring rates and distribution parameters. The results show that the win ratio method has similar power as the log-rank test and Cox model to detect the treatment difference when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true, and that the win ratio method outperforms log-rank test and Cox model in terms of power to detect the treatment difference when the survival curves cross.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
kk完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
lhr完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
四大天王看电势完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
小二郎完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
科研小白完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
早睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Yunshu采纳,获得10
4秒前
英俊安荷完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
爱吃地锅鱼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
蜡笔小z完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
要减肥香水完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ljw完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
清秀的仙人掌完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
liubo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
大白不白完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
求助人员发布了新的文献求助50
10秒前
胡女士完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
圈圈完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
踏雪飞鸿完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Fiona完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
青松完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
寒冷班完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
yy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
化唠师完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
Juvianne完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
墨墨完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
云ch完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
ZQY完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Hey完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
fxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
高山流水应助2403danlu采纳,获得10
22秒前
眯眯眼的海完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
话一完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
吴开珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
大气迎天完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
黙宇循光完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 2000
Research for Social Workers 1000
Psychology and Work Today 800
Kinesiophobia : a new view of chronic pain behavior 600
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5894292
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 6696019
关于积分的说明 15726010
捐赠科研通 5016341
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2701652
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1648019
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1597954