Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials

医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 随机对照试验 入射(几何) 纳入和排除标准 临床试验 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 内科学 系统回顾 梅德林 疾病 替代医学 传染病(医学专业) 病理 物理 政治学 法学 光学
作者
Jayesh Beladiya,Anup Kumar,Yogesh Vasava,Krupanshu Parmar,Dipanshi Patel,Sandip Pravin Patel,Sandip Dholakia,Devang Sheth,Sai H. S. Boddu,Chirag Patel
出处
期刊:Reviews in Medical Virology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (1): e2507-e2507 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1002/rmv.2507
摘要

Abstract Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have been discovered within a very small duration of time as compared to the traditional way for the development of vaccines, which raised the question about the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness and safety of vaccine platforms against the incidence of COVID‐19. The literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and clinical trials.gov databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 February 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Statement guidelines were followed. Among 284 articles received by keywords, a total of 11 studies were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (studies in special populations, e.g., pregnant women, paediatric patients, editorials, case reports, review articles, preclinical and in vitro studies) of the study. A total of 247,186 participants were considered for randomisation at baseline, among them, 129,572 (52.42%) were provided with vaccine (Intervention group) and 117,614 (47.58%) with the placebo (Control group). A pooled fold change estimation of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12–0.31, p < 0.0001) showed significant protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 in the vaccines received group versus the placebo group. mRNA based, inactivated vaccines and non‐replicating viral vector‐based vaccines showed significantly protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 compared to placebo with pooled fold change estimation was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06–0.10), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.29) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46), respectively. Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non‐replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit‐based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA‐based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS‐CoV‐2 than other platforms.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
朱123完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
fang发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
香蕉觅云应助终须有采纳,获得10
1秒前
羊羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
曾金福发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
搞怪雅霜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
慕青应助LlLly采纳,获得10
2秒前
蜀山刀客发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
这这莉完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Hello应助bahung采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
无奈藏鸟发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
李蜜完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
英俊的铭应助Leeee采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
酷波er应助浊酒采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
鹅鹅鹅完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
欧哈纳完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
星辰大海应助lilili采纳,获得10
6秒前
欢呼的裘完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
田浩完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
结实小夏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
明天见发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI6.3应助Kiritoshi采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
xiaohansan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
北风2022发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
ding应助Thea采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
石头完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
HXY完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
图图的饼干完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6438671
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8252768
关于积分的说明 17562692
捐赠科研通 5496960
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2899046
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1875710
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1716489