亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials

医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 随机对照试验 入射(几何) 纳入和排除标准 临床试验 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 内科学 系统回顾 梅德林 疾病 替代医学 传染病(医学专业) 病理 物理 政治学 法学 光学
作者
Jayesh Beladiya,Anup Kumar,Yogesh Vasava,Krupanshu Parmar,Dipanshi Patel,Sandip Pravin Patel,Sandip Dholakia,Devang Sheth,Sai H. S. Boddu,Chirag Patel
出处
期刊:Reviews in Medical Virology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (1): e2507-e2507 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1002/rmv.2507
摘要

Abstract Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have been discovered within a very small duration of time as compared to the traditional way for the development of vaccines, which raised the question about the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness and safety of vaccine platforms against the incidence of COVID‐19. The literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and clinical trials.gov databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 February 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Statement guidelines were followed. Among 284 articles received by keywords, a total of 11 studies were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (studies in special populations, e.g., pregnant women, paediatric patients, editorials, case reports, review articles, preclinical and in vitro studies) of the study. A total of 247,186 participants were considered for randomisation at baseline, among them, 129,572 (52.42%) were provided with vaccine (Intervention group) and 117,614 (47.58%) with the placebo (Control group). A pooled fold change estimation of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12–0.31, p < 0.0001) showed significant protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 in the vaccines received group versus the placebo group. mRNA based, inactivated vaccines and non‐replicating viral vector‐based vaccines showed significantly protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 compared to placebo with pooled fold change estimation was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06–0.10), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.29) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46), respectively. Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non‐replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit‐based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA‐based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS‐CoV‐2 than other platforms.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
luster完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
yyds发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
good猫妮完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
飘逸焱完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
范特西完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
momo发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
vio完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
万能的悲剧完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
yyds完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
28秒前
33秒前
一粟完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
梨凉完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
舟君儒完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
ChloeD完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
wtian完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
奋斗的绝悟完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
46秒前
科研小牛完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
51秒前
51秒前
53秒前
56秒前
柯语雪发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
从容惊蛰发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
1分钟前
1分钟前
归尘应助遇见馅儿饼采纳,获得10
1分钟前
潇洒洙发布了新的文献求助20
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
梨子完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
petiteblanche发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
小鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
李小小发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Iron toxicity and hematopoietic cell transplantation: do we understand why iron affects transplant outcome? 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1021
上海破产法庭破产实务案例精选(2019-2024) 500
Teacher Wellbeing: Noticing, Nurturing, Sustaining, and Flourishing in Schools 500
EEG in Childhood Epilepsy: Initial Presentation & Long-Term Follow-Up 500
Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5476231
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4577910
关于积分的说明 14363115
捐赠科研通 4505792
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2468878
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1456491
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1430126