Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials

医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 随机对照试验 入射(几何) 纳入和排除标准 临床试验 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 内科学 系统回顾 梅德林 疾病 替代医学 传染病(医学专业) 病理 物理 政治学 法学 光学
作者
Jayesh Beladiya,Anup Kumar,Yogesh Vasava,Krupanshu Parmar,Dipanshi Patel,Sandip Pravin Patel,Sandip Dholakia,Devang Sheth,Sai H. S. Boddu,Chirag Patel
出处
期刊:Reviews in Medical Virology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (1): e2507-e2507 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1002/rmv.2507
摘要

Abstract Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have been discovered within a very small duration of time as compared to the traditional way for the development of vaccines, which raised the question about the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness and safety of vaccine platforms against the incidence of COVID‐19. The literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and clinical trials.gov databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 February 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Statement guidelines were followed. Among 284 articles received by keywords, a total of 11 studies were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (studies in special populations, e.g., pregnant women, paediatric patients, editorials, case reports, review articles, preclinical and in vitro studies) of the study. A total of 247,186 participants were considered for randomisation at baseline, among them, 129,572 (52.42%) were provided with vaccine (Intervention group) and 117,614 (47.58%) with the placebo (Control group). A pooled fold change estimation of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12–0.31, p < 0.0001) showed significant protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 in the vaccines received group versus the placebo group. mRNA based, inactivated vaccines and non‐replicating viral vector‐based vaccines showed significantly protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 compared to placebo with pooled fold change estimation was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06–0.10), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.29) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46), respectively. Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non‐replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit‐based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA‐based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS‐CoV‐2 than other platforms.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
渡边卯卯完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
忒寒碜完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
假装新疆人烤大串儿完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
彭于晏应助jiaolinya采纳,获得10
1秒前
szx4520完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
思源应助现代的东蒽采纳,获得10
1秒前
小美爱科研完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
xcky0917发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Dlan完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小包子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
67完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
bcl完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
陆一完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
江南之南完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
ANQ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
酷酷雪曼完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
不做精神世界的瘸子完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
路冰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
suhanxing完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
复杂黑夜发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Tong完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
kiwi完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
火乐乐完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
完美世界应助淡淡山兰采纳,获得10
8秒前
krysten完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
ashura发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
王小磊完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
5648完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
dadazhou完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
包包完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Introduction to Cosmetic Formulation and Technology, 2nd Edition 400
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
Birth of Twins After Genome Editing for HIV Resistance 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6689883
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8433551
关于积分的说明 18017834
捐赠科研通 5916436
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2984440
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1960446
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1898853