亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Safety and efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials

医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 随机对照试验 入射(几何) 纳入和排除标准 临床试验 2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19) 内科学 系统回顾 梅德林 疾病 替代医学 传染病(医学专业) 病理 物理 政治学 法学 光学
作者
Jayesh Beladiya,Anup Kumar,Yogesh Vasava,Krupanshu Parmar,Dipanshi Patel,Sandip Pravin Patel,Sandip Dholakia,Devang Sheth,Sai H. S. Boddu,Chirag Patel
出处
期刊:Reviews in Medical Virology [Wiley]
卷期号:34 (1): e2507-e2507 被引量:68
标识
DOI:10.1002/rmv.2507
摘要

Abstract Vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) have been discovered within a very small duration of time as compared to the traditional way for the development of vaccines, which raised the question about the safety and efficacy of the approved vaccines. The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness and safety of vaccine platforms against the incidence of COVID‐19. The literature search was performed on PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and clinical trials.gov databases for studies published between 1 January 2020 and 19 February 2022. Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta‐Analysis Statement guidelines were followed. Among 284 articles received by keywords, a total of 11 studies were eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (studies in special populations, e.g., pregnant women, paediatric patients, editorials, case reports, review articles, preclinical and in vitro studies) of the study. A total of 247,186 participants were considered for randomisation at baseline, among them, 129,572 (52.42%) were provided with vaccine (Intervention group) and 117,614 (47.58%) with the placebo (Control group). A pooled fold change estimation of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12–0.31, p < 0.0001) showed significant protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 in the vaccines received group versus the placebo group. mRNA based, inactivated vaccines and non‐replicating viral vector‐based vaccines showed significantly protection against the incidence of COVID‐19 compared to placebo with pooled fold change estimation was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06–0.10), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14–0.29) and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.28–0.46), respectively. Injection site discomfort and fatigue were the most common side effect observed in mRNA, non‐replicating viral vector, inactivated, and protein subunit‐based vaccines. All the approved vaccines were found safe and efficacious but mRNA‐based vaccines were found to be more efficacious against SARS‐CoV‐2 than other platforms.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
灵巧小夏完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
5秒前
10秒前
简单的语风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
K丶口袋发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
小二郎的应助被K丶口袋采纳,获得10
21秒前
22秒前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
优雅的傲柏完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
peek1ove完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
32秒前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
Orange的应助被渡人舟采纳,获得13
41秒前
45秒前
45秒前
平淡的忆梅完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
K丶口袋发布了新的文献求助10
50秒前
gszy1975完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
yoqalux发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
科研通AI2S的应助被K丶口袋采纳,获得10
55秒前
逮劳完成签到 ,获得积分10
59秒前
小二郎的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
爆米花的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
粗犷的颜完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
昏睡的碧菡完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ari发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
忧郁小鸽子完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
K丶口袋发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
脑洞疼的应助被K丶口袋采纳,获得10
1分钟前
yoqalux完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
潇湘夜雨完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
123完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
冯冯完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
朴实的懿轩完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
ASZI完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
K丶口袋发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
molihuakai的应助被K丶口袋采纳,获得10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
自動車の空力技術 800
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Issues in Task-Based Language Teaching 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7782599
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9322145
关于积分的说明 20387111
捐赠科研通 7370952
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3320428
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2468277
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2336472