Human factors and medication safety

医学 钦佩 过程(计算) 患者安全 临床实习 公共关系 护理部 法学 心理学 社会心理学 计算机科学 医疗保健 政治学 操作系统
作者
Peter Hambly
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia [Wiley]
卷期号:78 (7): 920-920 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/anae.16014
摘要

I commend Kelly et al. [1] on their well-written guidelines for implementing human factors in anaesthesia, though I read it with a mixture of admiration and despair. It is profoundly disappointing that the use of prefilled syringes has found no place in the list of recommendations and that, instead, the avoidable practice of picking ampoules from boxes and manually drawing up medication is officially endorsed. It is as though the principles of human factors, so clearly and rigorously applied in the rest of the guidance, have been suspended when it comes to medication safety. Drawing up medication in the acute clinical environment is associated with a 17-fold increase in errors [2]; unacceptable rates of bacterial contamination [3]; and significant levels of harmful cognitive load. Anaesthetists are drawing up drugs at such a rate that adherence to even the most lenient intravenous medicines preparation policy is impossible. The only way to “incorporate human factors principles” into this process is to remove it altogether. The guidance disappointingly ignores this. Instead, there are appeals to improve ampoule labelling aimed at a generic drug industry which can barely supply our basic needs, and sub-recommendations, buried deep in the text, that prefilled syringes should be used “where available”. The availability is the problem, and until bolder recommendations emerge from our professional bodies, so it will remain. Our collective timidity is also partly responsible for the debacle of the Carter Report [4], which is an innovative and workable parliamentary proposal to supply prefilled syringes almost everywhere except in anaesthesia settings. That our profession could be entirely ignored by such an important initiative is nothing short of humiliation. The road to universal provision of prefilled syringes will not be quick or easy, but it starts with statements of intent and setting of standards. It requires us to highlight, quite apart from anything else, that manually preparing intravenous medication is indefensible in terms of human factors. The institutional indifference to prefilled syringes is costing lives; these otherwise excellent guidelines have missed a big opportunity to take a step in the right direction.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
NexusExplorer应助无私语儿采纳,获得10
1秒前
一把白刀完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
cdercder应助zhouyan采纳,获得10
2秒前
小哲发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
5秒前
6秒前
田様应助糊涂的熊猫采纳,获得10
6秒前
wangrblzu应助一叶知秋采纳,获得20
6秒前
碧蓝世立发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
快乐滑板发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
淡新梅发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
小萝卜头发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
小哲完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
13秒前
完美元柏发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
白刀完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
山月发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
zws发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
琉璃发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
科研通AI5应助赛猪采纳,获得30
16秒前
Noob_saibot完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Andy完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
Qiang发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
科研通AI5应助淡新梅采纳,获得10
18秒前
Akim应助感动秋采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
多多发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
快乐滑板发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
Orange应助小萝卜头采纳,获得10
24秒前
高分求助中
Applied Survey Data Analysis (第三版, 2025) 800
Assessing and Diagnosing Young Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2nd Edition) 700
Pteromalidae 600
Images that translate 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3842734
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3384765
关于积分的说明 10537175
捐赠科研通 3105298
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1710207
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 823561
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 774137