Assessing numeracy and medication calculations within undergraduate nursing education: A qualitative study

计算能力 主题分析 能力(人力资源) 声誉 医学教育 护理部 护士教育 心理学 医学 定性研究 教育学 社会学 社会心理学 社会科学 读写能力
作者
Christine Minty‐Walker,Nathan J. Wilson,Leanne Rylands,Jim Pettigrew,Leanne Hunt
出处
期刊:Nursing open [Wiley]
卷期号:11 (7): e2226-e2226 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1002/nop2.2226
摘要

Abstract Aim To explore how undergraduate nursing students are assessed on nursing numeracy and medication calculations from the perspective of Australian nurse education leaders. Design A qualitative study. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 17 nurse education leaders between November 2022 and January 2023. Braun and Clarke's six phases of thematic analysis were used to analyse the data. Results Five key themes were identified: (i) high expectations to keep the public safe, (ii) diverse assessment formats, (iii) different ways of managing assessment integrity, (iv) assessment conditions incongruent to the clinical setting and (v) supporting struggling students. Conclusion Nurse education leaders set high standards requiring students to achieve 100% in numeracy and medication calculation assessments, thus maintaining the reputation of nursing and patient safety. However, students struggled to meet this expectation. Diverse assessment formats were implemented, with some examination conditions contrary to clinical practice. Currently, there is no benchmark or independent point of registration examination in Australia, hence the problem is each university had a different standard to judge students' competence. Gaining insight into how these assessments are conducted provides an opportunity to work towards an evidence‐based model or benchmark for the assessment of numeracy. Implications for the Profession Dosage errors in clinical practice threaten patient safety and the reputation of the nursing profession. The accuracy rate of calculations by undergraduate and registered nurses is deficient worldwide. This research highlights a major educational issue, that being the wide variation in how numeracy assessments are conducted with no clear pedagogical rationale for a standardised method. Such assessments would establish a national standard, contributing to quality assurance, the development of the nursing profession and improve patient safety.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
iNk应助开放金鱼采纳,获得10
1秒前
小鲤鱼科研记加强版关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
邢夏之发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
4秒前
无畏甜桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
值班室禁止学习完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
moya发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
无死何能生新颜完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
ying完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
烟花应助sonnet采纳,获得30
12秒前
xy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
七七完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Leo发布了新的文献求助80
14秒前
ying发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
杏林靴子发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
阿米完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
游大达完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
19秒前
马马发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
CLK123456完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
晓笙完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
22秒前
Owen应助yehhh采纳,获得30
22秒前
做好人难完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
23秒前
23秒前
徐反宁发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
XQQDD应助柠溪采纳,获得20
24秒前
完美世界应助马马采纳,获得10
24秒前
阿飞发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
zhenzhangfynu发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development Across Adulthood 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6448297
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8261342
关于积分的说明 17600261
捐赠科研通 5510485
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2902599
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1879639
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1720495