医学
败血症
血压
丸(消化)
心脏病学
超声波
前瞻性队列研究
内科学
重症监护室
麻醉
放射科
作者
Andrew S. Liteplo,Jessica Schleifer,Keith A. Marill,Calvin Huang,Stacey K. Gouker,Daniel Ratanski,Eden Diamond,Michael R. Filbin,Hamid Shokoohi
出处
期刊:Shock
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-02-11
卷期号:56 (3): 419-424
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/shk.0000000000001755
摘要
ABSTRACT Purpose: We sought to assess whether ultrasound (US) measurements of carotid flow time (CFTc) and carotid blood flow (CBF) predict fluid responsiveness in patients with suspected sepsis. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of hypotensive (systolic blood pressure < 90) patients “at risk” for sepsis receiving intravenous fluids (IVF) in the emergency department. US measurements of CFTc and CBF were performed at time zero and upon completion of IVF. All US measurements were repeated after a passive leg raise (PLR) maneuver. Fluid responsiveness was defined as normalization of blood pressure without persistent hypotension or need for vasopressors. Results: A convenience sample of 69 patients was enrolled. The mean age was 65; 49% were female. Fluid responders comprised 52% of the cohort. CFTc values increased significantly with both PLR ( P = 0.047) and IVF administration ( P = 0.003), but CBF values did not ( P = 0.924 and P = 0.064 respectively). Neither absolute CFTc or CBF measures, nor changes in these values with PLR or IVF bolus, predicted fluid responsiveness, mortality, or the need for intensive care unit admission. Conclusion: In patients with suspected sepsis, a fluid challenge resulted in a significant change in CFTc, but not CBF. Neither absolute measurement nor delta measurements with fluid challenge predicted clinical outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI