无容量
医学
易普利姆玛
危险系数
肿瘤科
内科学
人口
化疗
可视模拟标度
肺癌
置信区间
癌症
免疫疗法
外科
环境卫生
作者
Martin Reck,Tudor–Eliade Ciuleanu,Jong Seok Lee,Michael Schenker,Clarisse Audigier-Valette,Bogdan Żurawski,Helena Linardou,Gregory A. Otterson,Pamela Salman,Makoto Nishio,Emmanuel de la Mora Jimenez,Krysztof Lesniewski-Kmak,István Albert,Samreen Ahmed,Konstantinos Syrigos,John R. Penrod,Yong Yuan,Steven I. Blum,Faith E. Nathan,Xiaowu Sun
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2020.12.019
摘要
IntroductionIn CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826), patients with treatment-naive stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and 1% or greater tumor programmed death ligand 1 expression had significantly improved overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy. We present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs).MethodsPatients (N = 1189) were randomized to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy. PROs were exploratory. Changes in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) average symptom burden index, LCSS 3-item global index, EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS), and EQ-5D utility index were analyzed descriptively. Mixed-effect model repeated measures and time-to-first deterioration and improvement analyses were conducted.ResultsPRO completion rates were generally greater than 80%. On-treatment improvements from baseline in LCSS measures of symptom burden and global health status with nivolumab plus ipilimumab generally met or exceeded the minimal important difference (smallest clinically meaningful change) from weeks 24 and 30, respectively; improvements with chemotherapy generally remained below the minimal important difference. Mean on-treatment EQ-5D VAS scores for both treatments approached the U.K. population norm at week 24, remaining so throughout the treatment period. Mixed-effect model repeated measures analyses revealed numerically greater improvements from baseline with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy across LCSS average symptom burden index and 3-item global index, and EQ-5D VAS and utility index. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab had delayed time-to-first deterioration (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.74 [0.56 to 0.98]) and a trend for more rapid time-to-first improvement (1.24 [0.98 to 1.59]) versus chemotherapy.ConclusionsNivolumab plus ipilimumab revealed delayed deterioration and numerical improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and 1% or greater programmed death ligand 1 expression.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI