弃权
小儿肿瘤学
食品药品监督管理局
医学
药物开发
小儿癌症
肿瘤科
梅德林
临床肿瘤学
药品审批
重症监护医学
药品
内科学
癌症
药理学
政治学
法学
作者
Shivam Kamlesh Patel,Rupert W. Leong,Hong Zhao,Amy Barone,Denise Casey,Qi Liu,Gilbert J. Burckart,Gregory H. Reaman
摘要
Oncology products developed for adult cancers often receive full waivers of pediatric studies. This analysis retrospectively identified products with potential pediatric development opportunities despite a full waiver. Initial pediatric study plans submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration from 2012 to 2016 for oncology products with plans to request full waivers of pediatric studies were reviewed to determine if a scientific rationale existed for pediatric evaluation based on the molecular mechanism of action (MOA), clinical experience, nonclinical evidence, or published genome sequencing data. Of the 98 oncology products reviewed, pediatric studies were eventually conducted in 55 (56%) despite having a waiver, 33 additional (34%) products were considered to have a rationale for pediatric evaluation but were not studied, and 10 (10%) products had no current evidence to support pediatric development. Conducting pediatric studies based on molecular MOA, rather than indication, provides opportunities to evaluate products earlier and accelerate pediatric oncology drug development.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI