Assessment of communication and physical exam skills: A comparison of students, faculty and standardized patients

麦克内马尔试验 分级(工程) 医学教育 沟通技巧 威尔科克森符号秩检验 心理学 考试(生物学) 自我评估 医学 课程 教育学 古生物学 统计 土木工程 数学 工程类 生物
作者
Maria Cuevas‐Nunez,Maria Teresa Pulido,Spencer E. Harpe,Joshua Epstein,Kelly A. Lempicki
出处
期刊:Journal of Dental Education [Wiley]
卷期号:86 (7): 853-862 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1002/jdd.12892
摘要

Abstract Purpose/objectives The objective of this retrospective study was twofold: it aimed to investigate dental students’ communication and physical exam self‐assessment skills by comparing students’ self‐evaluations with those completed by faculty and standardized patients (SPs). Second, it aimed to compare faculty and SPs assessment of students’ communication skills. Methods At the end of their first year of training, students ( n = 127), participated in one SP encounter about an initial dental consultation. Students completed self‐assessment before receiving feedback from faculty ( n = 19) and SPs ( n = 19). The data source included evaluation forms submitted by students, faculty and SPs. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the overall scores between groups. Agreement between evaluations items were analyzed with McNemar's test ( p < 0.05). Results Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in how students and faculty graded for either communication ( p = 0.6724) or physical exam ( p = 0.1921) skills. However, both students and faculty provided less favorable marks than SPs for communication skills with a statistically significant difference in the overall grading between both students and SPs ( p = 0.0146) and between faculty and SPs ( p = 0.0045). Conclusions While there was disagreement between students and faculty versus SPs, they weren't meaningful differences in scores and the dissimilarities mainly consisted of ratings of explanation skills. We suggest that, when applicable, dental student's self‐evaluations may represent an alternative to faculty assessments of communication and physical exam skills. Nonetheless, we recommend that SPs be included in the assessment of communication skills to provide students with comprehensive feedback that more realistically represents the natural patient‐provider relationship.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
拼搏的败完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
777发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
在水一方的应助被lll采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
领导范儿的应助被QX采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
jie发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
洽洽鹰击完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
小二郎的应助被文静的人雄采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
……发布了新的文献求助80
11秒前
11秒前
华仔的应助被鳗鱼颖采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
充电宝的应助被机灵的沂采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
lll发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
molihuakai的应助被Redemption采纳,获得10
14秒前
Melancholylre完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
lin319完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
汉堡包的应助被Ren采纳,获得10
15秒前
YCYycy完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
彩色大白菜真实的钥匙完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
Lucky发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
共享精神的应助被jie采纳,获得10
17秒前
ZM9450发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
打打的应助被jie采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
李爱国的应助被qin采纳,获得10
18秒前
Melancholylre发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
21秒前
邓宸峰完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
sean完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
耶耶耶完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
流风发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Geo_new发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Convergent and bidirectional strategies towards the total synthesis of hemibrevetoxin B 300
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7796981
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9332557
关于积分的说明 20450414
捐赠科研通 7387685
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3325237
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2472406
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2342422