投资(军事)
贸易便利化
促进
开放式投资公司
结算(财务)
外商直接投资
经济
国际经济学
业务
发展中国家
国际贸易
市场经济
投资回报率
财务
经济增长
自由贸易
政治学
宏观经济学
法学
管理
政治
付款
生产(经济)
标识
DOI:10.1093/jnlids/idac023
摘要
ABSTRACT The trend of ‘investment facilitation’ is increasingly attracting lively discussions in the field of international investment policies. The reason for this is that countries expect to use ‘investment facilitation’ as a policy tool to improve the domestic investment environment. In this trend, as an important part of the realization path of ‘investment facilitation’, there is an increasing concern on how to reform the international investment dispute settlement mechanism to achieve amicable settlement of investment frictions between investors and host states. China, Brazil and South Africa have proposed three different options for reforming the international investment dispute settlement mechanism under the trend of ‘investment facilitation’. Based on the analysis of the three countries’ dispute settlement mechanism reform models, this article examines their impact on the international investment governance mechanism and finally proposes inspirations for the design and reform of future international investment dispute settlement models in developing countries.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI