Ultrasound‐guided neuraxial puncture: translating evidence to practice

医学 超声波 放射科 医学物理学
作者
Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho,Kariem El‐Boghdadly
出处
期刊:Anaesthesia [Wiley]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/anae.16558
摘要

AnaesthesiaEarly View Editorial Ultrasound-guided neuraxial puncture: translating evidence to practice Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Corresponding Author Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-5453 @clistenes_cc Academic Unit of Medicine, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil Correspondence to: Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorKariem El-Boghdadly, Kariem El-Boghdadly orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-717X @elboghdadly Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK King's College, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho, Corresponding Author Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-5453 @clistenes_cc Academic Unit of Medicine, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil Correspondence to: Clístenes Crístian de Carvalho Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorKariem El-Boghdadly, Kariem El-Boghdadly orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-717X @elboghdadly Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK King's College, London, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 05 February 2025 https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16558 1 Academic Unit of Medicine, Federal University of Campina Grande, Campina Grande, Brazil 2 Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK 3 King's College, London, UK Bluesky: @decarvalhocc.bsky.social; @elboghdadly.bsky.social Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookxLinkedInRedditWechat References 1Haskins SC, Bronshteyn Y, Perlas A, et al. American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians – part II: recommendations. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46: 1048–1060. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-102561. 10.1136/rapm-2021-102561 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38: 219–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Lamperti M, Biasucci DG, DIsma N, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound-guided for vascular access (PERSEUS vascular access). Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37: 344–376. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001180. 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001180 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Chui J, Lavi R, Hegazy AF, Jones PM, Arellano R, Yang H, Bainbridge D. Identifying barriers to the use of ultrasound in the perioperative period: a survey of southwestern Ontario anesthesiologists. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4040-2. 10.1186/s12913-019-4040-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar 5Ramachandran S, Malhotra N, Velayudhan S, Bajwa SJS, Joshi M, Mehdiratta L, Hiremath VR. Regional anaesthesia practices in India: a nationwide survey. Indian J Anaesth 2019; 49: 257–262. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_803_21. 10.4103/ija.ija_803_21 Google Scholar 6Young B, Onwochei D, Desai N. Conventional landmark palpation vs. preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics – a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analyses. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 818–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15255. 10.1111/anae.15255 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7de Carvalho CC, Porto Genuino W, Vieira Morais MC, De Paiva OH, Rodrigues AI, El-Boghdadly K. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided neuraxial puncture: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105547. 10.1136/rapm?2024?105547 Google Scholar 8Cook TM, Counsell D, Wildsmith JAW. Major complications of central neuraxial block: report on the third National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen360. 10.1093/bja/aen360 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9Kamimura Y, Yamamoto N, Shiroshita A, et al. Comparative efficacy of ultrasound guidance or conventional anatomical landmarks for neuraxial puncture in adult patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132: 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.006. 10.1016/j.bja.2023.09.006 PubMedGoogle Scholar 10Delgado C, Bollag L, Van Cleve W. Neuraxial labor analgesia utilization, incidence of postdural puncture headache, and epidural blood patch placement for privately insured parturients in the United States (2008–2015). Anesth Analg 2020; 131: 850–856. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004561. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004561 PubMedGoogle Scholar 11Sjulstad AS, Odeh F, Baloch FK, Berg DH, Arntzen K, Alstadhaug KB. Occurrence of postdural puncture headache—a randomized controlled trial comparing 22G Sprotte and Quincke. Brain Behav 2020; 10: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1886. 10.1002/brb3.1886 Google Scholar 12Stendell L, Lundstrøm LH, Wetterslev J, Itenov TS, Rosenstock CV. Risk factors for and prediction of a difficult neuraxial block: a cohort study of 73,579 patients from the Danish Anaesthesia database. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015; 40: 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000293. 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000293 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 13Maranhao B, Liu M, Palanisamy A, Monks DT, Singh PM. The association between post-dural puncture headache and needle type during spinal anaesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15320. 10.1111/anae.15320 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 14Niraj G, Mushambi M, Gauthama P, et al. Persistent headache and low back pain after accidental dural puncture in the obstetric population: a prospective, observational, multicentre cohort study. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15491. 10.1111/anae.15491 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 15Kalagara H, Nair H, Kolli S, Thota G, Uppal V. Ultrasound imaging of the spine for central neuraxial blockade: a technical description and evidence update. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2021; 11: 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-021-00456-3. 10.1007/s40140-021-00456-3 Google Scholar 16Karim HMR. Difficult spinal-arachnoid puncture (DSP) score: development and performance analysis. Cureus 2023; 15: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33760. 10.7759/cureus.33760 Google Scholar 17Del Buono R, Pascarella G, Costa F, et al. Predicting difficult spinal anesthesia: development of a neuraxial block assessment score. Minerva Anestesiol 2021; 87: 648–654. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14892-2. 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14892-2 PubMedGoogle Scholar 18Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, et al. Instructional design features in ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia simulation-based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527. 10.1111/anae.16527 PubMedGoogle Scholar 19O'Farrell G, McDonald M, Kelly FE. 'Tea trolley' difficult airway training. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 104. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12964. 10.1111/anae.12964 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 20Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 4: CD011136. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3. 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 21Hansel J, El-Boghdadly K. Are we there yet? The long journey of videolaryngoscopy into the mainstream. Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16057. 10.1111/anae.16057 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22de Carvalho CC, Guedes IHL, Dantas MVM, El-Boghdadly K. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation by experienced anaesthetists: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 1371–1373. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16448. 10.1111/anae.16448 PubMedGoogle Scholar 23de Carvalho CC, da Silva DM, Lemos VM, et al. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in tracheal intubation in adults: a ranking systematic review and network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15626. 10.1111/anae.15626 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 24Lyons C, Harte BH. Universal videolaryngoscopy: take care when crossing the Rubicon. Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 688–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15977. 10.1111/anae.15977 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 25Ward PA. The videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy debate: a wider-angled view. Anaesthesia 2023; 78: 1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16046. 10.1111/anae.16046 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 26Nathanson MH, Bogod DG, Harrop-Griffiths W. Mandatory training for rare anaesthetic events. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 1145–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16381. 10.1111/anae.16381 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 27Abraham-Thomas N, Ahmad I, El-Boghdadly K. The how and the what of mandatory training. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 1382–1383. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16414. 10.1111/anae.16414 PubMedGoogle Scholar 28Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Beverley CA, Thomas SM. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1116–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03906.x. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03906.x CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29Ehlers L, Jensen JM, Bendtsen TF. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound vs nerve stimulation guidance for continuous sciatic nerve block. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 804–808. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes259. 10.1093/bja/aes259 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
MewZero完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
淡然白山完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
王五一完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
认真的飞扬完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xinyuzhang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
社牛小柯完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
桐桐应助晋启轩采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
狻猊龙虾完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
林一又完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
满座完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
电子屎壳郎完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
biocreater完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
9秒前
阿金完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
小魏完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
等等完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
ILS完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
化学胖子完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
星辰大海应助阿北采纳,获得10
17秒前
半夏黄良发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
闪闪青雪完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
落寞剑成完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
端庄的豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
CrsCrsCrs完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
1111chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
zhaozhao完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
YuLu完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
jie完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Akjan完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
半夏黄良完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
LL完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
坚定书竹完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
要开心完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
酱紫完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
周周完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS 500
微纳米加工技术及其应用 500
Nanoelectronics and Information Technology: Advanced Electronic Materials and Novel Devices 500
Performance optimization of advanced vapor compression systems working with low-GWP refrigerants using numerical and experimental methods 500
Constitutional and Administrative Law 500
PARLOC2001: The update of loss containment data for offshore pipelines 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5294333
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4444199
关于积分的说明 13832392
捐赠科研通 4328271
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2376032
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1371362
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1336532