根管
索引(排版)
牙科
后牙
医学
口腔正畸科
计算机科学
万维网
作者
Norachai Wongkornchaowalit,Taratorn Soontornkiat,Tadkamol Krongbaramee,Attawood Lertpimonchai,Keith Krell
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2025.08.012
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Cracked teeth requiring root canal treatment present with variable prognoses. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of root canal-treated posterior cracked teeth and to identify prognostic factors influencing endodontic outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 263 cracked posterior teeth with 1- to 5-year follow-up was analyzed. The Iowa index was modified by subcategorizing each stage according to crack extension. Outcomes were assessed using strict clinical and radiographic criteria. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of failure. RESULTS: The overall success and survival rates were 82.9% and 89.7%, respectively, with a mean follow-up period of 40.3 months. The estimated 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 99.2% and 78.6%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified 7 independent predictors of failure: increasing age, pocket depth ≥5 mm along the crack line, radicular extension ≥3 mm, preoperative periapical lesion, multiple crack lines, absence of occlusal splint in patients with parafunctional habits, and restoration with onlay or composite. Cracked teeth with probing depths <5 mm (Stages I-III) showed favorable outcomes (success rate: 78.9%-98.3%, survival rate: 86.5%-100%), whereas those exhibiting both radicular extension and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm (Stage IV-R) had poor prognosis (success rate: 33.3%, survival rate: 63.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The modified Iowa index, incorporating the classification of crack extension, demonstrated prognostic value. The combination of radicular crack and periodontal pocket ≥5 mm should be considered a high-risk profile when evaluating the treatment potential of cracked teeth.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI