法拉第效率
阳极
电解质
锂(药物)
材料科学
商业化
电化学
基质(水族馆)
纳米技术
电极
再现性
工作(物理)
计算机科学
工艺工程
化学
机械工程
工程类
医学
海洋学
地质学
色谱法
内分泌学
物理化学
法学
政治学
作者
Meili Guan,Zengwu Wei,Rui Liu,Xufeng Yan,Shanshan Sun,Mingjiong Zhou,Snežana Papović,Kun Zheng,Zoran Mandić,Xing Xin
标识
DOI:10.1002/smtd.202500923
摘要
Abstract Driven by the demand for high‐energy‐density storage, Lithium metal batteries (LMBs) and anode‐free Lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) have attracted significant attention due to their high theoretical capacity and low reduction potential. However, achieving reproducible Coulombic Efficiency (CE) measurements remains a challenge due to inconsistencies in electrochemical protocols and experimental conditions. This study systematically evaluates and compares three CE measurement methodologies, identifying key factors that influence reproducibility and accuracy. Unlike previous studies, which often report CE values without considering their methodological limitations, the impact of electrolyte composition, electrolyte concentration, and electrode surface properties are highlighted on CE variations. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that a pre‐cycling Li reservoir method effectively minimizes substrate effects, leading to the most sensitive measurements across various testing conditions. This work provides a standardized framework for CE evaluation in LMBs and AFLMBs, offering valuable insights for optimizing Li‐free anode interfaces and accelerating the commercialization of high‐performance LMBs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI