Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

检查表 奇纳 答辩人 定性研究 数据收集 背景(考古学) 研究设计 焦点小组 定性性质 心理学 梅德林 医学教育 应用心理学 医学 计算机科学 护理部 社会学 认知心理学 法学 古生物学 机器学习 生物 社会科学 心理干预 人类学 政治学
作者
Allison Tong,Peter Sainsbury,Jonathan C. Craig
出处
期刊:International Journal for Quality in Health Care [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:19 (6): 349-357 被引量:28822
标识
DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
摘要

Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design.To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups).We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed.Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting.The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
linwenfengcool完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
情怀应助坎坎坷坷k采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
4秒前
Cherubines发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
羊皮大哈发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
tangtang完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
棒槌发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI5应助Jeff采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
彭于晏应助dxd采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
梓辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
是小曹啊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
徐梦丽完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
泥巴发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
share发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
bkagyin应助GDMU采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
123关闭了123文献求助
20秒前
zpyu发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
PEITON发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
泥巴完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
24秒前
solitude完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
科研通AI5应助标致的问晴采纳,获得30
26秒前
搞怪的善若完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
atopes完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
Peng发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
31秒前
七友完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
32秒前
高分求助中
Mass producing individuality 600
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
非光滑分析与控制理论 500
Разработка метода ускоренного контроля качества электрохромных устройств 500
A Combined Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Study of ε-Polylysine in the Rat 400
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 300
Superiority of opioid free anesthesia with regional block over opioid anesthesia with regional block in the quality of recovery after retroperitoneiscopic renal surgery: a randomized controlled trial 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3826985
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3369244
关于积分的说明 10455158
捐赠科研通 3088870
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1699521
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 817361
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 770188