Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data

医学 地高辛 观察研究 荟萃分析 置信区间 内科学 科克伦图书馆 安慰剂 相对风险 随机对照试验 梅德林 倾向得分匹配 严格标准化平均差 心力衰竭 替代医学 病理 法学 政治学
作者
Oliver J. Ziff,Deirdre A. Lane,Monica Samra,Michael Griffith,Paulus Kirchhof,Gregory Y.H. Lip,Richard P. Steeds,John Townend,Dipak Kotecha
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmj.h4451
摘要

Objective To clarify the impact of digoxin on death and clinical outcomes across all observational and randomised controlled trials, accounting for study designs and methods. Data sources and study selection Comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, reference lists, and ongoing studies according to a prospectively registered design (PROSPERO: CRD42014010783), including all studies published from 1960 to July 2014 that examined treatment with digoxin compared with control (placebo or no treatment). Data extraction and synthesis Unadjusted and adjusted data pooled according to study design, analysis method, and risk of bias. Main outcome measures Primary outcome (all cause mortality) and secondary outcomes (including admission to hospital) were meta-analysed with random effects modelling. Results 52 studies were systematically reviewed, comprising 621 845 patients. Digoxin users were 2.4 years older than control (weighted difference 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.6), with lower ejection fraction (33% v 42%), more diabetes, and greater use of diuretics and anti-arrhythmic drugs. Meta-analysis included 75 study analyses, with a combined total of 4 006 210 patient years of follow-up. Compared with control, the pooled risk ratio for death with digoxin was 1.76 in unadjusted analyses (1.57 to 1.97), 1.61 in adjusted analyses (1.31 to 1.97), 1.18 in propensity matched studies (1.09 to 1.26), and 0.99 in randomised controlled trials (0.93 to 1.05). Meta-regression confirmed that baseline differences between treatment groups had a significant impact on mortality associated with digoxin, including markers of heart failure severity such as use of diuretics (P=0.004). Studies with better methods and lower risk of bias were more likely to report a neutral association of digoxin with mortality (P<0.001). Across all study types, digoxin led to a small but significant reduction in all cause hospital admission (risk ratio 0.92, 0.89 to 0.95; P<0.001; n=29 525). Conclusions Digoxin is associated with a neutral effect on mortality in randomised trials and a lower rate of admissions to hospital across all study types. Regardless of statistical analysis, prescription biases limit the value of observational data.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
qwerqwer完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
lwl完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
阿锐科研发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
无限草丛发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
qwe给qwe的求助进行了留言
6秒前
6秒前
lee完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
华仔应助王欣采纳,获得10
9秒前
Aierlan611发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
王欣瑶发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
暮时完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
zyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
阿锐科研完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
向晚完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Hjwhjwing发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
FashionBoy应助alex采纳,获得10
17秒前
桐桐应助Aierlan611采纳,获得10
18秒前
20秒前
11发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
26秒前
26秒前
26秒前
刘小帅发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
不配.应助风清扬采纳,获得100
29秒前
29秒前
拼搏流沙发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
安子发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
啾啾完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
王欣瑶完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
筱xiao发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
41秒前
43秒前
lssable完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
方曦辉发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
semua关注了科研通微信公众号
48秒前
彩色短靴完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Third Edition 2023 2000
求中国石油大学(北京)图书馆的硕士论文,作者董晨,十年前搞太赫兹的 500
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
Narrative Method and Narrative form in Masaccio's Tribute Money 500
Aircraft Engine Design, Third Edition 500
Neonatal and Pediatric ECMO Simulation Scenarios 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4761452
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4101600
关于积分的说明 12691780
捐赠科研通 3817341
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2107183
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1131853
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1010750