羽扇豆醇
蜂胶
补丁测试
色谱法
气相色谱-质谱法
质谱法
医学
气相色谱法
斑贴试验
苯甲酸苄酯
有机化学
化学
食品科学
作者
Evelyn Calta,Anton C. de Groot,Aleksandra Chojnacka,N. Ipenburg,Thomas Rustemeyer
出处
期刊:Dermatitis
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2026-08-14
卷期号:: 17103568261476312-17103568261476312
标识
DOI:10.1177/17103568261476312
摘要
Background: Propolis, Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru), and colophonium are complex botanical materials that frequently co-react when patch tested. Detailed knowledge of their compositions may help explain the co-reactivity pattern and identify the haptens responsible for positive patch tests. Objective: To study the compositions of propolis, M. pereirae resin, and colophonium used for patch testing and assess whether they contain identical ingredients. Methods: The ingredients of 3 samples of propolis, 2 of M. pereirae resin and 2 of colophonium used for preparing patch test preparations by Chemotechnique and SmartPractice (brand Allergeaze) were analyzed using gas chromatography—mass spectrometry. Results: Major ingredients in Brazilian propolis were non-volatile fatty materials; in Chinese propolis tectochrysin, pinostrobin, pinocembrin, and p -vinylguaiacol; in M. pereirae resin benzyl benzoate, benzyl cinnamate and nerolidol; in colophonium Chemotechnique isoabienol, β-caryophyllene, sandaracopimarinal, sandaracopimarinol and longifolene; in colophonium Allergeaze lupeol acetate, longifolene, sandaracopimarinol, abietinal and isoabienol. Only 11 chemicals were present in 2 materials, none in all 3. Conclusions: Very few identical chemicals were found in propolis, M. pereirae resin, and colophonium. The results do not support the notion that the frequently observed co-reactivity to these complex natural materials can be explained by identical chemicals detected in this study.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI