Refractive Coupling Effects in Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction Procedures: A Machine Learning–Assisted Approach

Purpose To evaluate the impact of refractive couplings in myopia and myopic astigmatism with two different keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) systems. Methods This was a retrospective evaluation of refractive outcomes with two different lasers studying 2,841 eyes undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) (VisuMax 500; Carl Zeiss Meditec) and 2,528 eyes undergoing SmartSight (ATOS; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH). Coupling effects (derived from the ratio between partial slopes) were determined for sphere and cylinder and for spherical equivalent, cardinal, and oblique astigmatism separately. Results Statistically significant coupling effects were observed for both the VisuMax and ATOS systems, as indicated by P values less than .05. For the VisuMax, a coupling effect of 8% of cylinder into sphere and a 2% coupling of sphere into cylinder was found. For the ATOS, the coupling effect of sphere into cylinder was 1%. A 3% coupling effect of oblique astigmatism into cardinal astigmatism in the VisuMax, and conversely, a 0.1% coupling effect of defocus into oblique astigmatism in the ATOS were found. In cases with no astigmatism plan, sphere had a 2% effect on induced astigmatism in the VisuMax and 0.6% in the ATOS. In high astigmatism plans, sphere had a significant 16% impact on cylinder in the VisuMax. Additionally, the effect of defocus on cardinal astigmatism was 6% in the VisuMax and 0.8% on oblique astigmatism in the ATOS. Conclusions Despite the P values less than .05 indicating statistical significance, the observed coupling effects were consistently low, with magnitudes below 10%, even for astigmatism exceeding 2.50 diopters. These couplings may be partly attributed to cross-effects of torsional eye movements. Coupling values for KLEx were markedly lower than those reported for non-aspheric excimer laser ablations. The results suggest that surgical results may be refined further by optimizing nomograms to mitigate coupling effects. [ J Refract Surg . 2024;40(10):e706–e715.]