医学
超声波
高频超声
外围设备
预测值
核医学
回顾性队列研究
前臂
内科学
放射科
外科
作者
Marco Fogante,Cicorella Nicola,Claudio Ventura,Tagliati Corrado,Giulio Argalia
摘要
ABSTRACT Aim High‐frequency ultrasound with an 18‐MHz probe (18 MHz‐HFUS) plays a relevant role in the evaluation of peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Ultrahigh‐frequency ultrasound with a 70‐MHz probe (70 MHz‐UHFUS) offers higher spatial resolution and could allow a better detection of PNI. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of HFUS and UHFUS in PNI detection. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, were selected, between July 2022 and April 2024, 61 patients underwent HFUS, UHFUS, and nerve conduction study (NCS) for clinical suspicion of traumatic forearm PNI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of HFUS and UHFUS in PNI detection were calculated and compared. NCS was used as the reference standard. Nonparametric statistical tests were used. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Comparing the diagnostic performance in PNI detection, the 70 MHz‐UHFUS showed a sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy significantly higher than 18 MHz‐HFUS, respectively, 98.0% versus 82.4% ( p = 0.0205) and 95.1% versus 82.0% ( p = 0.0468). Otherwise, not significantly difference were in specificity, PPV, and NPV. Conclusions UHFUS compared to HFUS demonstrated a higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in PNI detection.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI