医学
中止
Carfilzomib公司
内科学
临床终点
不利影响
多发性骨髓瘤
人口
胃肠病学
地塞米松
子群分析
肿瘤科
外科
置信区间
临床试验
硼替佐米
环境卫生
作者
Kihyun Kım,Chang‐Ki Min,Youngil Koh,Kenichi Ishizawa,Sung‐Hyun Kim,Shigeki Ito,Junji Tanaka,Michihiro Uchiyama,Yawara Kawano,Jin Seok Kim,Philippe Moreau,Thomas G. Martin,Yvonne Dong,Marie‐Laure Risse,Kenshi Suzuki
标识
DOI:10.1007/s12185-022-03378-w
摘要
In the phase 3 IKEMA study (NCT03275285), isatuximab (Isa) plus carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), compared with Kd. This IKEMA subgroup analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of Isa-Kd versus Kd among East Asian patients. Eligible patients had 1–3 prior lines of therapy and were stratified by number of prior lines and revised International Staging System. The primary endpoint was PFS. Key secondary endpoints included overall response, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, and complete response (CR) rate. Forty-six East Asian patients (19 Japanese, 27 South Korean) were randomized to Isa-Kd (n = 25) or Kd (n = 21). Isa-Kd improved PFS (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.23–1.76), ≥VGPR (80.0% vs 52.4%), MRD negativity rate (44.0% vs 9.5%), and CR (44.0% vs 23.8%). The rate of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 79% for Isa-Kd versus 55% for Kd. The rate of serious TEAEs was 46% versus 50%, and the rate of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 4% versus 10%. Overall, Isa-Kd improved efficacy and safety versus Kd in East Asian patients with relapsed MM, consistent with the overall IKEMA population.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI