Total fat consumption and pancreatic cancer risk

医学 混淆 荟萃分析 相对风险 研究异质性 置信区间 胰腺癌 出版偏见 队列研究 内科学 子群分析 队列 癌症 肿瘤科 人口学 社会学
作者
Qiwei Shen,Qiyuan Yao
出处
期刊:European Journal of Cancer Prevention [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:24 (4): 278-285 被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1097/cej.0000000000000073
摘要

Fat consumption has been hypothesized to influence pancreatic cancer risk, but the results of epidemiologic studies have been controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control and cohort studies to investigate this issue. Relevant published studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (PubMed) through February 2014. Two authors (Q.-W.S. and Q.-Y.Y.) independently assessed eligibility and the extracted data. Study-specific relative risks (RRs) were pooled using a random-effects model. We also carried out heterogeneity and publication bias analyses. Six cohort and 13 case–control studies with 6159 pancreatic cancer cases and 1 068 476 noncases were included in this meta-analysis. The summary RR for pancreatic cancer for the highest versus lowest intake was 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI)=0.90–1.20, I2=57.3%, P for heterogeneity=0.001] for total fat. In addition, when separately analyzed by study design, case–control (RR=1.03, 95% CI=0.83–1.27, I2=55.8%, P for heterogeneity=0.007) and cohort studies (RR=1.05, 95% CI=0.85–1.29, I2=66.7%, P for heterogeneity=0.010) yielded similar results. Furthermore, no statistically significant associations were observed in the subgroup analyses on the basis of fat source, geographic location, whether using energy-adjusted models, and whether adjusted for several potential confounders and important risk factors. There was no evidence of publication bias or significant heterogeneity between subgroups on meta-regression analyses. The results of this meta-analysis do not support an independent association between diets high in total fat and pancreatic cancer risk.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
爆米花应助Alaskan采纳,获得10
刚刚
lin完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
CodeCraft应助洋了个洋采纳,获得10
1秒前
只此青绿完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
果汁完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
cqz发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
杨扬洋发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Jasper应助开朗飞丹采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
四季发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
所所应助sdl采纳,获得10
3秒前
Anothermoon完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
哇呀呀发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
赵zhao完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
肚子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
jianjianjiang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
石榴发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
一只兔子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
欣慰人生发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
带刺的玫瑰完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
wanci应助杨扬洋采纳,获得10
10秒前
李健应助苗条如冬采纳,获得10
10秒前
慕青应助Ignorance-Penny采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
王某人发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
蔡佩翰完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 1234
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Petrology and Plate Tectonics,2025 400
Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery 400
New directions for experimental lessons in science teaching: Myth, Mystery, Necessity? by Emily K. da Silva Cunha Souto (Author), Flávia Lins Silva (Author) 333
Scientific experimentation in the classroom: Comparison between genetic-Socratic-exemplary teaching and workshop teaching by Ingrid Hofer (Author) 333
Programming for Chemical Engineers Using C, C++, and MATLAB 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6720861
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8457524
关于积分的说明 18056196
捐赠科研通 5972850
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2996229
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1972229
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1925931