医学
血压
预测值
价值(数学)
内科学
急诊医学
人口学
儿科
环境卫生
老年学
统计
社会学
数学
作者
Enheng Cai,Ling Chen,Yajuan Wang,De‐Wei An,Jin Zhang,Xiaofeng Tang,Yan Li,Yan Wang,Dingliang Zhu
标识
DOI:10.1097/hjh.0000000000002867
摘要
Background: Blood pressure variability is a common physiological phenomenon; however, the association between within-visit and visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure and all-cause mortality remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of blood pressure variability among 11 721 adults who underwent blood pressure measurement on three occasions within a period of 6 months. Within-visit and visit-to-visit variability was quantified using the standard deviation and maximum--minimum difference between measures. The predictive effect of this variability on all-cause mortality was evaluated using Kaplan--Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis. Results: The incidence of all-cause mortality was significantly higher for participants in the top quintile of within-visit and visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and for those with sustained high within-visit variability. Within-visit variability was not retained as a risk factor after adjustment in Cox regression models. The hazard ratio for mortality increased from 48 to 55% for the top quintile of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and from 56 to 61% for sustained high within-visit variability. The risk of mortality remained statistically higher even if visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was added to the model, including consistency of within-visit blood pressure variability and vice versa. Conclusion: Visit-to-visit and sustained high within-visit blood pressure variability were significant positive prognostic factors for all-cause mortality. Our findings underlined the clinical significance of achieving stable blood pressure in an effective plan of hypertension management.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI