医学
多塞平
可视模拟标度
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
安慰剂
观察研究
系统回顾
置信区间
神经病理性疼痛
麻醉
指南
相对风险
物理疗法
梅德林
外科
内科学
替代医学
病理
政治学
法学
作者
Christopher McGovern,Tara Quasim,Kathryn Puxty,Martin Shaw,Wijnand Ng,Charlotte Gilhooly,Nikolaos Arkoulis,Michael Basler,Alan Macfarlane,Lia Paton
标识
DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2021-000810
摘要
Pruritus is a common and often distressing complication after a burn injury. The purpose of this review is to explore the efficacy of drugs classically used to treat neuropathic pain in the management of pruritus after burn injury.A systematic literature search of medical databases was conducted to find studies investigating drugs listed in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline (CG173, "neuropathic pain in adults") for the management of pruritus after burn injury in patients of any age. Controlled studies were stratified by the drug class studied and their risk of bias before conducting meta-analysis. A narrative review of case series or observational studies was presented. Severity of pruritus at any time point, with all quantitative and qualitative measures, was included.Fifteen studies were included in the final analysis, 10 investigated the use of gabapentinoids, 4 studied doxepin, and 1 local anesthetic agents. Meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that the use of gabapentinoids was associated with an improvement in mean VAS (Visual Analog Scale) 0-10 scores of 2.96 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.20 to 4.73, p<0.001) when compared with placebo or antihistamine. A meta-analysis of four RCTs investigating topical doxepin showed an improvement in mean VAS scores of 1.82 (95% CI 0.55 to 3.09, p<0.001). However, when excluding two studies found to be at high risk of bias, no such improvement was found (-0.32, 95% CI -1.64 to -0.99, p=0.83).This study suggests that gabapentinoids are beneficial in the management of burn-related pruritus. There is a lack of evidence to suggest that doxepin is an effective treatment. Topical local anesthetic agents may be safe and beneficial, but studies are scarce.Systematic review, level II.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI