芳香疗法
随机对照试验
焦虑
芳香
心率
心理干预
医学
干预(咨询)
物理疗法
麻醉
心理学
听力学
血压
内科学
精神科
食品科学
替代医学
化学
病理
作者
Anna Hohneck,Melissa Troia,V Kolár,Simone Weingaertner,Kirsten Merx,Felicitas Sarodnick,Athanasios Mavratzas,Iris Burkholder,G. Schumacher,Wolf‐Karsten Hofmann,Ralf–Dieter Hofheinz
摘要
Introduction: Integrative therapeutic approaches are able to improve psychophysiological outcomes in cancer patients. Whether additional beneficial effects can be achieved by combining aromatherapy to sound intervention is unclear. Methods: Eighty cancer patients were randomized (1:1) to either a 20-min sound intervention (“sound only,” classical music via headphones) or a sound intervention combined with aromatherapy (“aroma”). Cardiovascular parameters (measured with VascAssist2.0), visual analogue scales for emotional well-being, anxiety, stress, pain and sadness, and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory were assessed before and after intervention. Results: Sound only led to a significant reduction in the heart rate, while a trend for a lower heart rate was observed in the aroma group. Both pulse wave velocity (p = 0.04) and vascular resistance (p = 0.04) were reduced by sound only. Psychophysiological outcomes were improved by both interventions with a more pronounced but not significantly different effect on pain reduction by aroma (aroma p < 0.001; sound only p = 0.002). Conclusion: Both interventions were able to improve psychophysiological outcomes. In terms of cardiovascular parameters, a sound intervention alone achieved greater but not significantly different results compared to aroma, while the addition of aromatherapy yielded no substantial additional effects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI