The Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: The Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab system does not include a pelvic compensation (PC) subtype, potentially contributing to gaps in clinical characteristics and treatment strategy for deformity correction. It also remains uncertain as to whether PC has differing roles in sagittal balance (SB) or imbalance (SI) status. To compare radiological parameters and SRS-22r domains between patients with failed pelvic compensation (FPC) and successful pelvic compensation (SPC) based on preoperative SB and SI. METHODS: A total of 145 adult spinal deformity patients who received deformity correction were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected for statistical analysis. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on the median value of PT/PI ratio (PTr) and the cutoff value of SB. Patients with low PTr and high PTr were defined as FPC and SPC, respectively. Radiographic and clinical characteristics of different groups were compared. RESULTS: Patients with SPC exhibited significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, PTr, and T1 pelvic angle as compared to patients with FPC, irrespective of SB or SI. No apparent differences in any of SRS-22r domains were observed at follow-up when comparing the SB-FPC and SB-SPC patients. However, patients with SI-SPC exhibited significantly better function, self-image, satisfaction, and subtotal domains at follow-up relative to those with SI-FPC. When SI-FPC and SI-SPC patients were subdivided further based on the degree of PI-LL by adjusting for age, the postoperative function and self-image domains were significantly better in the group with overcorrection of PI-LL than undercorrection of PI-LL in SI-FPC patients. However, no differences in these SRS-22r scores were observed when comparing the subgroups in SI-SPC patients. CONCLUSION: Flexible pelvic rotation is associated with benefits to the correction of sagittal parameters, irrespective of preoperative SB or SI status. However, PC is only significantly associated with clinical outcomes under SI. Patients with SI-FPC exhibit poorer postoperative clinical outcomes, which should be recommended to minimize PI-LL.