聊天机器人
随机对照试验
可用性
医学
物理疗法
病人教育
灵活性(工程)
患者满意度
白内障手术
患者安全
平衡(能力)
远程医疗
平衡训练
梅德林
电子健康
患者体验
数字健康
人工智能
医疗急救
护理部
作者
Paul Cardon de Lichtbuer,William Declerck,Quinten Rosseel,Perseverence Savieri,Silke Oellerich,Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill
标识
DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001856
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and usability of a safety-first, clinician-validated conversational artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot for cataract surgery education compared with standard brochures. SETTING: University Hospital (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Adults scheduled for cataract operation were randomized to receive either standard information brochures alone (control group) or brochures plus access to a hospital-specific chatbot ("Mina"). Primary outcomes were knowledge gain, change in preinformation to postinformation anxiety, and satisfaction. Those outcomes were measured with questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included chatbot usability (measured with the System Usability Scale [SUS]) and engagement with the chatbot. RESULTS: 64 patients were randomized (chatbot group 33, control group 31). Postoperative questionnaires were completed by 35 patients (14/33 chatbot, 21/31 control). No significant differences were detected in knowledge gain, anxiety change, or satisfaction ( P > .05). Knowledge increased in both groups after receiving information ( P < .001). In the chatbot group, 17 of 33 (52%) did not engage with the chatbot. Participants engaging with the chatbot tended to be younger (mean age: 64.1 ± 10.9 years) than those who did not (mean age: 74.1 ± 10.5 years). Among users, 63% of submitted questions matched validated answers. The SUS mean score indicated high usability (83.1 ± 12.1). CONCLUSIONS: A custom-built chatbot with only clinician-validated responses showed high usability but did not improve knowledge, reduce anxiety, or increase satisfaction compared with brochures. Chatbot engagement barriers, particularly among older adults, and limits of validated-only content indicate the need for a hybrid approach of those models, to balance safety and flexibility in digital patient education.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI