比伐卢定
医学
肝素
直接凝血酶抑制剂
心脏病学
不利影响
内科学
临床终点
冲程(发动机)
心力衰竭
肝素诱导血小板减少症
抗凝剂
植入
外科
入射(几何)
大出血
生存分析
并发症
显著性差异
循环系统
作者
Áine Lynch,Muhammad Shezad,Benjamin Kroslowitz,A. Jeewa,J. Dykes,Sabrina Law,Matthew O’Connor,Ryan J. Butts,Anna Joong,Angela Lorts,Shahnawaz Amdani,Christina VanderPluym
出处
期刊:Asaio Journal
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2026-03-12
标识
DOI:10.1097/mat.0000000000002692
摘要
Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is increasingly used as an alternative to heparin in pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and has resulted in improved stroke-free survival in children supported by paracorporeal pulsatile devices. However, for those supported by implanted continuous-flow devices, such as HeartMate 3, significant practice variation exists in agents used as early intravenous anticoagulation. Leveraging ACTION VAD registry data, we sought to compare early hemocompatibility-related adverse events (<14 days) in pediatric HeartMate 3 patients on bivalirudin versus heparin (unfractionated heparin [UFH]). A total of 234 patients, aged under 25 years, with a median age of 15 years and a median weight of 60 kg, at the time of HeartMate 3 implant, were included in the study cohort. Of these, 100 (42.7%) received bivalirudin as initial intravenous anticoagulation agent and 134 (57.2%) received UFH. With data censored at change of agent, there was no significant difference between the groups for freedom from stroke (96.9% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.77) or bleeding (94.8% vs. 89.9% %, p = 0.21), but time to transition to oral anticoagulation was longer for the bivalirudin group. Survival at 1 year after implant was also not different between groups. These data suggest that bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative to UFH for early thromboprophylaxis after HeartMate 3 implantation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI