Defining Priorities for Nursing Organizational Well‐Being: A Delphi Study of Organizational Variables and Interventions

德尔菲法 心理干预 组织承诺 心理学 组织学习 护理部 干预(咨询) 组织行为与人力资源 组织发展 组织研究 德尔菲 组织安全 组织文化 护理干预分类 感知组织支持 组织绩效 知识管理 组织有效性 应用心理学 梅德林 实证研究 组织行为学 经验证据 护理文献 变量 内容有效性
作者
Federica Forcellini,Valerio Della Bella,Alessandro Sili,Jacopo Fiorini
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.70619
摘要

AIM(S): To achieve expert consensus on key organizational variables and categories of organizational interventions considered most relevant for promoting nurses' organizational well-being. DESIGN: An e-Delphi study. METHODS: Three panels of experts were enrolled: nursing managers, clinical nurses and occupational psychologists. Eight variables from the Nursing Organizational Well-being model and six categories of intervention drawn from the literature were rated for perceived usefulness, applicability and organizational feasibility. Consensus was defined with thresholds for percentage agreement (≥ 75%; ≥ 85%), Content Validity Ratio (CVR ≥ 0.49) and Coefficient of Variation (CV < 0.5). RESULTS: Eighty-four experts took part in Round 1, and forty-four in Round 2. The organizational variables with the most stable consensus were professional autonomy, workload, support from colleagues and superiors, with agreement > 90% and CV < 0.2. Among the areas of intervention, there was high consensus on organizational support. Mindfulness, meditation, yoga and digital interventions, although supported by literature, did not achieve a stable consensus. CONCLUSION: This study identified organizational variables and areas of intervention that achieved stable expert consensus and can guide future organizational planning and empirical evaluation, rather than prescriptive recommendations, to improve nursing organizational well-being. IMPACT: What problem did the study address? There is a lack of agreement on which organizational variables and areas of intervention should be a priority to support the organizational well-being of nurses, despite the extensive and heterogeneous literature on this topic. What were the main findings? Nurses, nursing managers and occupational psychologists agreed that: Organizational and work support, as well as educational/training were the most rated areas for intervention. Experts rated professional autonomy, workload and peer and supervisory support as priority areas in influencing nurses' well-being. Already noted interventions, such as mindfulness or yoga, did not reach consensus. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The study results, highlighting shared priorities among experts, can inform nursing managers, organizational leadership and policymakers and guide organizational decision-making processes in designing future interventions. Professional autonomy, organizational support and working conditions emerged as shared expert priorities that may inform organizational reflection on nurses' well-being and workplace sustainability. REPORTING METHOD: The study was conducted according to the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
王萌萌完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
3秒前
Lixiang完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
闪闪山水完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
就想按时下班完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
拾个勤天完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
LJS发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
搞怪的水彤完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
踏实绯完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Zoeyren完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
科研废柴完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
FashionBoy应助悬铃木采纳,获得10
19秒前
超人不会飞完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
英俊的海7887完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
YeeLeeLee完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
zy完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
打打应助瓜瓜瓜采纳,获得10
24秒前
simongao完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
Elytra发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
czx完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
molihuakai应助时尚的从凝采纳,获得10
31秒前
暖羊羊Y完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
csg888888完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
KJ完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
路先生完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
化工兔完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
John完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
ggtry完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
烸烸完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
朱大头完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
kuandong完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
灵巧一手完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
gaogao完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
思源应助朱大头采纳,获得30
41秒前
超超完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 5000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
政治传播过程中的外交与说服——以中苏友好协会为例的历史考察 566
Discerning Saints: Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation and Selective Prosociality at Work 500
Handbuch Trainingswissenschaft – Trainingslehre 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7579506
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9158987
关于积分的说明 19593233
捐赠科研通 7162171
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3265695
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2430692
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2256503