Ultra-high-resolution photon-counting detector computed tomography of the lungs: Phantom and clinical assessment of radiation dose and image quality

成像体模 医学 核医学 图像质量 图像噪声 断层摄影术 图像分辨率 放射科 光学 物理 计算机科学 图像(数学) 人工智能
作者
Jordan Chamberlin,Carter D. Smith,Dhruw Maisuria,John A. Parrish,Elizabeth van Swol,Eugene Mah,Tilman Emrich,U. Joseph Schoepf,Ákos Varga-Szemes,Jim O’Doherty,Reginald F. Munden,Sameer Tipnis,Dhiraj Baruah,Ismail Kabakus
出处
期刊:Clinical Imaging [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:104: 110008-110008
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.110008
摘要

Photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) offers enhanced noise reduction, spatial resolution, and image quality in comparison to energy-integrated-detectors CT (EID-CT). These hypothesized improvements were compared using PCD-CT ultra-high (UHR) and standard-resolution (SR) scan-modes.Phantom scans were obtained with both EID-CT and PCD-CT (UHR, SR) on an adult body-phantom. Radiation dose was measured and noise levels were compared at a minimum achievable slice thickness of 0.5 mm for EID-CT, 0.2 mm for PCD-CT-UHR and 0.4 mm for PCD-CT-SR. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated for five tissue densities. Additionally, data from 25 patients who had PCD-CT of chest were reconstructed at 1 mm and 0.2 mm (UHR) slice-thickness and compared quantitatively (SNR) and qualitatively (noise, quality, sharpness, bone details).Phantom PCD-CT-UHR and PCD-CT-SR scans had similar measured radiation dose (16.0mGy vs 15.8 mGy). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) (9.0HU vs 9.6HU). PCD-CT-UHR (0.2 mm) had slightly higher noise level (11.1HU). Phantom PCD-CT-SR (0.4 mm) had higher SNR in comparison to EID-CT (0.5 mm) while achieving higher resolution (Bone 115 vs 96, Acrylic 14 vs 14, Polyethylene 11 vs 10). SNR was slightly lower across all densities for PCD-CT UHR (0.2 mm). Interestingly, CNR was highest in the 0.2 mm PCD-CT group; PCD-CT CNR was 2.45 and 2.88 times the CNR for 0.5 mm EID-CT for acrylic and poly densities. Clinical comparison of SNR showed predictably higher SNR for 1 mm (30.3 ± 10.7 vs 14.2 ± 7, p = 0.02). Median subjective ratings were higher for 0.2 mm UHR vs 1 mm PCD-CT for nodule contour (4.6 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.1, p = 0.02), bone detail (5 ± 0 vs 4 ± 0.1, p = 0.001), image quality (5 ± 0.1 vs 4.6 ± 0.4, p = 0.001), and sharpness (5 ± 0.1 vs 4 ± 0.2).Both UHR and SR PCD-CT result in similar radiation dose levels. PCD-CT can achieve higher resolution with lower noise level in comparison to EID-CT.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
皮皮琪完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Fu发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
2秒前
无花果应助123采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
yummm完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
kirakira发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
梦舞生汐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
FashionBoy应助老实的水蜜桃采纳,获得10
4秒前
qqq完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
科研通AI6.3应助xu采纳,获得10
6秒前
英姑应助dusai采纳,获得10
6秒前
chiech完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
儒雅晓霜发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
强健的宛儿完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
yet完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
Man完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
汉堡包应助超级的千青采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
科目三应助勇闯天涯采纳,获得10
11秒前
陈小小完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
海布里的风完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
xun发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
羊与布克发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
香蕉觅云应助moonlight采纳,获得10
14秒前
赘婿应助淡淡新竹采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
雪白浩轩完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
vv发布了新的文献求助30
16秒前
minnie完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6545286
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8334406
关于积分的说明 17859589
捐赠科研通 5654508
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2937440
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1913685
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1777020