医学
心脏病学
心绞痛
内科学
血运重建
缺血
心肌梗塞
作者
Ranil de Silva,Kevin Cheng,Timothy D. Henry,Divaka Perera,Viviany R. Taqueti,Ana Abreu,Fabienne E. Vervaat,Martha Gulati,Hiroaki Shimokawa,Felicita Andreotti,Juan Carlos Kaski
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf284
摘要
Abstract The diagnosis of refractory angina has conventionally been limited to patients with angina and ischaemia secondary to obstructive atherosclerotic epicardial coronary disease who experience persistent symptoms despite optimal pharmacological and revascularization therapies. It is now well-established that angina may also be caused by ischaemia resulting from coronary microcirculatory disorders, coronary vasospasm, and bridging in the absence of obstructive epicardial coronary disease or after “successful” revascularization. This increasingly prevalent and symptomatic group of patients, with both angina and demonstrable ischaemia, have been excluded from the conventional definition of refractory angina. In patients with obstructive epicardial coronary disease, disturbed microcirculatory and vasomotor function, amongst other ischaemic mechanisms, may account for continuing symptoms despite revascularization. Under-recognition of these mechanisms results in inadequate treatment and symptom persistence. In this review, a redefinition of refractory angina is proposed to include the full spectrum of patients experiencing persistent angina despite current maximal guideline-directed medical and revascularization therapies. Systematic approaches for comprehensive investigation are suggested to identify underlying mechanisms of ischaemia and stratify treatments accordingly. The complex needs of patients with refractory angina are likely best addressed by an inter-disciplinary Angina Heart Team with the aim of improving patient symptoms, quality of life, and clinical outcomes.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI