失眠症
多导睡眠图
优势比
睡眠开始
清醒
非快速眼动睡眠
心理学
睡眠(系统调用)
医学
听力学
内科学
精神科
脑电图
计算机科学
操作系统
作者
Kari Lambing,Veronica Guadagni,Bethany Gerardy,Amy M. Bender,Magdy Younes,Célyne Bastien
摘要
ABSTRACT The study investigated differences in objective markers of sleep depth and identified phenotypes of insomnia. Participants were screened with the Insomnia‐Severity‐Index and clinical interviews and assigned to control ( n = 50) or insomnia ( n = 69) groups. They completed three nights of in‐laboratory overnight polysomnography. We measured the Odds Ratio Product (ORP), a continuous measure of sleep depth (0 = deep sleep, 2.5 = full wakefulness) and calculated: (a) ORP in stages Wake, NREM, REM, (b) percentage of TRT in deep sleep (ORP < 0.5) and full‐wakefulness (ORP > 2.25), (c) number/hour of sleep of transient increases in ORP to wake levels (Wake Intrusion Index [WII]), (d) gamma power, (e) frequency of alpha intrusions, (f) speed of return to deep sleep after arousals (ORP‐9). We used Latent Class Analysis to differentiate two insomnia groups with ‘Objectively Normal’ and ‘Objectively Poor’ metrics. The Objectively Poor group had higher ORP wake , ORP NREM , ORP REM , %TRT > 2.25, gamma power, alpha intrusion, WII and ORP‐9 than good sleeper (GSC) and the Objectively Normal group, illustrating evidence of hyperarousal, while the Objectively Normal group was comparable to GSC. The Objectively Poor group had higher %awake and lower TST. Both insomnia groups reported worse sleep and underestimated TST relative to GSC, despite similar objective sleep metrics in the Objectively Normal group. Using novel objective sleep metrics, we identified a subgroup of insomnia with abnormalities consistent with hyperarousal and another with no difference from GSC. Future research should test if these groups benefit from different treatment pathways and thus improve outcomes and time to determine appropriate treatments.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI