医学
德尔菲法
耐受性
临床试验
透明度(行为)
德尔菲
指南
医学物理学
协议(科学)
成果研究
梅德林
质量(理念)
家庭医学
医学教育
不利影响
卫生专业人员
替代医学
研究设计
多学科方法
临床终点
质量管理
最佳实践
卫生服务研究
相(物质)
背景(考古学)
数据收集
描述性统计
护理部
心理干预
临床研究
医疗保健
比较有效性研究
作者
Emily Alger,Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi,A. C. Dueck,Anna Minchom,madeline pe,John Devin Peipert,C. J. Snyder,S. Symeonides,Roger Wilson,W.A. Wood,Yu Qiao,Susan E. Bates,Helen Bulbeck,Lizzie Dean,Massimo Di Maïo,Aaron R. Hansen,Paulina Bartoszk,Ken Kobayashi,Dónal Landers,Christophe Le Tourneau
摘要
PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI