医学
医学物理学
样品(材料)
医学教育
梅德林
家庭医学
数据收集
止血
教育测量
血栓形成
样本量测定
作者
Eric Salazar,Kristi J. Smock,Taryn E Cazzolli,Jeffrey Samuel Dlott,Nathan Lickteig,Thomas A. Long,J. Justin Mulvey,Morayma Reyes Gil,Marian Rollins-Raval,Jun Teruya,Oksana Volod,Chance Avery Walker,Geoffrey D. Wool,Nicole D. Zantek,AJ Goodwin
摘要
Measurement of D-dimer, a fibrin degradation product, is crucial for diagnosing thrombotic and fibrinolytic conditions. Despite its expanding utility, D-dimer testing faces challenges due to varying assay methodologies and nonstandardized reporting. To understand D-dimer reporting practices, the College of American Pathologists Hemostasis and Thrombosis Committee analyzed proficiency testing data from D-dimer surveys conducted between 2020 and 2023 across multiple laboratories. The data demonstrate that laboratories commonly report units that differ from the assay package insert when reporting their proficiency testing results. We sought to assess variability in reporting practices and opportunities for improvement in D-dimer reporting amongst participants. To accomplish this, we harmonized all D-dimer results to ng/mL fibrinogen equivalent units from one distributed sample and assessed distinct populations of entries per instrument/reagent combination. Notable trends emerged from this analysis. Data from laboratories using the same instrument/reagent combinations clustered around different means, suggesting issues with unit reporting and/or conversion. Entries reported in mg/L or ug/mL D-dimer units commonly exhibited significant deviations from the dominant population. For one instrument/reagent combination, most reported values differed by approximately twice the certificate of analysis value. This analysis highlights potential issues with D-dimer reporting in proficiency testing. Whether these issues translate into issues with clinical D-dimer reporting requires further study.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI