规则网络
工作投入
心理学
构造(python库)
社会心理学
产业与组织心理学
员工敬业度
结构效度
考试(生物学)
任务(项目管理)
工作表现
判别效度
工作(物理)
工作满意度
结构方程建模
心理测量学
管理
发展心理学
计算机科学
机械工程
古生物学
内部一致性
机器学习
工程类
经济
生物
程序设计语言
作者
Michael S. Christian,Adela S. Garza,Jerel E. Slaughter
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
摘要
Many researchers have concerns about work engagement's distinction from other constructs and its theoretical merit. The goals of this study were to identify an agreed‐upon definition of engagement, to investigate its uniqueness, and to clarify its nomological network of constructs. Using a conceptual framework based on Macey and Schneider (2008; Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 1 , 3–30), we found that engagement exhibits discriminant validity from, and criterion related validity over, job attitudes. We also found that engagement is related to several key antecedents and consequences. Finally, we used meta‐analytic path modeling to test the role of engagement as a mediator of the relation between distal antecedents and job performance, finding support for our conceptual framework. In sum, our results suggest that work engagement is a useful construct that deserves further attention.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI