定性研究
对话框
工程教育
工程伦理学
多元方法论
纪律
失望
多样性(控制论)
实证研究
偏爱
教育研究
定性性质
定量研究
管理科学
计算机科学
社会学
数学教育
教育学
工程类
心理学
认识论
社会科学
工程管理
数学
人工智能
哲学
万维网
社会心理学
机器学习
统计
作者
Maura Borrego,Elliot P. Douglas,Catherine Amelink
标识
DOI:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x
摘要
Abstract The purpose of this research review is to open dialog about quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education research. Our position is that no particular method is privileged over any other. Rather, the choice must be driven by the research questions. For each approach we offer a definition, aims, appropriate research questions, evaluation criteria, and examples from the Journal of Engineering Education . Then, we present empirical results from a prestigious international conference on engineering education research. Participants expressed disappointment in the low representation of qualitative studies; nonetheless, there appeared to be a strong preference for quantitative methods, particularly classroom‐based experiments. Given the wide variety of issues still to be explored within engineering education, we expect that quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches will be essential in the future. We encourage readers to further investigate alternate research methods by accessing some of our sources and collaborating across education/social science and engineering disciplinary boundaries.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI