Defining HFpEF in rodents: a systematic review

射血分数保留的心力衰竭 医学 重症监护医学 心力衰竭 梅德林 文档 内科学 心脏病学 病理生理学 疾病 生物信息学 神经科学 病理
作者
Yamen Adrah,Niklas Hegemann,David Faidel,Mariya M. Kucherenko,Wolfgang M. Kuebler,Gabriele G. Schiattarella,Niklas Beyhoff,Jana Grune
出处
期刊:Cardiovascular Research [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:121 (14): 2134-2143 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1093/cvr/cvaf174
摘要

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has become the most diagnosed HF subtype representing a major public health burden with poor clinical outcome. Available treatment options for HFpEF are limited; hence, more in-depth basic/translational research is needed to identify novel therapeutic targets. Preclinical investigations frequently rely on mice and rat models of HFpEF, yet their phenotypic accuracy is often not sufficiently verified. Here, we explore the extent to which rodent models labelled as 'HFpEF' reflect clinical diagnostic guidelines. We hypothesized that many basic/translational research articles use the term 'HFpEF' for rodent models, though the extent to which they demonstrate HFpEF signs and symptoms according to clinical definitions may be limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the PubMed database, we identified N = 475 studies using animal models of HFpEF that were published between 2008 and 2023. After exclusion of non-original research articles, articles using animal species other than mice or rats, and articles which did not claim the label 'HFpEF', N = 407 studies remained and were evaluated, featuring a total of N = 317 experimental groups labelled as 'HFpEF'. Based on predefined diagnostic clusters derived from the HF guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, we found that 57% of these experimental groups (N = 179) presented with the recommended level of evidence to support the use of the label 'HFpEF'. More recent publication dates and higher journal impact factors were positively associated with HFpEF probability. CONCLUSION: Despite many original articles labelling mouse and rat models as 'HFpEF', approximately two out of five studies fail to provide sufficient evidence to back this claim. Hence, caution is advised when interpreting mechanistic or interventional findings from studies involving rodent HFpEF models, and phenotypic documentation should be thoroughly assessed by readers and reviewers prior to drawing conclusions on the pathophysiology or treatment of HFpEF.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
木12123发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Wu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
早日发文章完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
852应助从笙采纳,获得10
2秒前
messyknots完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Away完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
陶醉的念之完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
美丽思山完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
SciGPT应助阳阳秋采纳,获得10
2秒前
hydrate完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
GakkiOuO完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
baozeNG发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
丘比特应助哈哈哈采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
LIUYU完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
我陈雯雯实名上网完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
平凡的七月完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
李茵茵发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
zzk发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
6秒前
孙同学完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
丘比特应助GakkiOuO采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
nuuo完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
zzzzzhongjian完成签到 ,获得积分20
8秒前
9秒前
zz完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
等待的代容完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
繁花业已落完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
Wu完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Cheng9nine完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
默默的巧蕊完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
独特听莲发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
An Introduction to Foreign Language Learning and Teaching 750
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Les chinois de jakarta: temples et vie collective 500
The fast track to determining transfer functions of linear circuits: The student guide 500
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in Digital Age? Technology, AI Bots, and Psychotherapy after Covid 444
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7628184
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9202607
关于积分的说明 19731862
捐赠科研通 7197894
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3273933
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2436244
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2270126