医学
哮喘
安慰剂
狭缝
呼出气一氧化氮
荟萃分析
内科学
不利影响
舌下免疫疗法
科克伦图书馆
过敏
随机对照试验
糠酸莫米松
舌下给药
麻醉
胃肠病学
皮质类固醇
免疫疗法
免疫学
支气管收缩
病理
替代医学
癌症
生物
遗传学
作者
Dijiang Ma,Qiling Zheng,Jianing Sun,Shengjun Tang,W. He
标识
DOI:10.1177/19458924231193528
摘要
Objective Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been widely applied to treat patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). However, meta-analyses on the efficacy of SLIT in AR patients with asthma are still limited. Methods Literature without language limitation published before October 28, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. STATA 16.0 software was used for the meta-analysis of the extracted data. The results reported were symptom scores, drug scores, adverse effects rates, and cost of treatment. Results Ten studies involving 1722 patients met the inclusion criteria. The total rhinitis score (TRSS) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −1.23, 95% CI: −1.39-−1.06, P < .001) and total asthma symptom score (TASS) (WMD = −1.00, 95% CI: −1.12–0.89, P < .001) were significantly lower in the SLIT group than the placebo group. The SLIT group had higher rates of treatment-related adverse events (relative risk [RR] = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.77-4.48, P < .001) and total costs of treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-0.97, P < .001). There was no significant difference in inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose ( P = .195), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) ( P = .158), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) ( P = .237), and direct costs of treatment ( P = .630) between the SLIT and placebo groups. Conclusion SLIT may be a therapeutic method for improving rhinitis symptoms and asthma symptoms in AR patients with asthma. However, as there was significant heterogeneity in results, more high-quality and well-designed studies are needed in the future to elucidate the efficacy of SLIT.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI