Comparison of Outcomes Between 1- and 2-Stent Techniques for Medina Classification 0.0.1 Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

传统PCI 狼牙棒 医学 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 支架 心肌梗塞 心脏病学 人口 再狭窄 内科学 放射科 环境卫生
作者
Ki Hong Choi,Francesco Bruno,Yun‐Kyeong Cho,Leonardo De Luca,Young Bin Song,Jeehoon Kang,Alessio Mattesini,Hyeon‐Cheol Gwon,Alessandra Truffa,Hyo‐Soo Kim,Wojciech Wańha,Woo Jung Chun,Sebastiano Gili,Seung‐Ho Hur,Gérard Helft,Seung Hwan Han,Bernardo Cortese,Cheol Hyun Lee,Javier Escaned,Hyuck–Jun Yoon,Alaide Chieffo,Joo Yong Hahn,Guglielmo Gallone,Seung‐Hyuk Choi,Gaetano M. De Ferrari,Bon−Kwon Koo,Giorgio Quadri,Fabrizio D’Ascenzo,Chang‐Wook Nam,Ovidio De Filippo
出处
期刊:Jacc-cardiovascular Interventions [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:16 (17): 2083-2093 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.013
摘要

Although Medina 0.0.1 bifurcation lesions are often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in real-world practice, the optimal revascularization strategy for this lesion is uncertain. The current study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between 1- and 2-stent strategies in patients treated with PCI for Medina 0.0.1 bifurcation lesions. The extended BIFURCAT (Combined Insights From the Unified RAIN [Very Thin Stents for Patients with Left Main or Bifurcation in Real Life] and COBIS [Coronary Bifurcation Stenting] Bifurcation Registries) registry was obtained by patient-level merging the dedicated bifurcation COBIS II, III, and RAIN registries. Among 8,434 patients with bifurcation lesions undergoing PCI, 345 (4.1%) with Medina 0.0.1 lesions were selected for the current analysis. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stent thrombosis) at 800 days. In the total population, 209 patients (60.6%) received PCI with a 1-stent strategy and the remaining 136 patients (39.4%) with a 2-stent strategy. There was a tendency for higher use of a 1-stent strategy over time (36.0%, 47.4%, and 90.4% in 2003-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2017, respectively; P for trend < 0.001). For the treatment of Medina 0.0.1 lesions, there was no significant difference in the risk of MACE between 1- and 2-stent strategies (1 stent vs 2 stent, 14.3% vs 13.9%; HR: 1.034; 95% CI: 0.541-1.977; P = 0.92). The risk of MACE was also not significantly different when stratifying into 3 groups (1-stent crossover only, 1-stent with strut opening, and 2-stent strategy). In patients with a Medina 0.0.1 type bifurcation lesion, PCI with a 1-stent strategy showed comparable outcomes to that of a 2-stent strategy. (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting II [COBIS II]; NCT01642992; Coronary Bifurcation Stenting III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494; Very Thin Stents for Patients with Left Main or Bifurcation in Real Life [RAIN]; NCT03544294)

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
zz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
Thunder完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
谷野完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
鞋子亮发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
蓝天的应助被harden9159采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
酷炫如曼完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
TGU的小马同学完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
如泣草芥完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Hyp完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
墨宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
结实的采珊完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
April完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
鞋子亮完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
李健的应助被zzz1310采纳,获得10
29秒前
yyyyy完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
35秒前
受伤的爆米花完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
翰飞寰宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
38秒前
junmahmu完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
39秒前
42秒前
科研牛马完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
ghtsmile完成签到 ,获得积分10
43秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
Ping完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
小强x完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
48秒前
花生油炒花生米完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
王佳瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
51秒前
52秒前
zzz1310发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
57秒前
哥哥发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
微糖完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
中国器官捐献和移植发展报告(2024) 520
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0-11, 1998-2024 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7824066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9350384
关于积分的说明 20557178
捐赠科研通 7416858
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3334339
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2479699
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2354561