Antipsychotic drugs and their effects on cognitive function: protocol for a systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis

医学 荟萃分析 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 认知 随机对照试验 抗精神病药 精神科 系统回顾 安慰剂 临床心理学 梅德林 内科学 替代医学 政治学 病理 法学
作者
Lena Feber,Natalie Peter,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Spyridon Siafis,Irene Bighelli,Wulf‐Peter Hansen,Daniel Prates Baldez,Georgia Salanti,Richard S.E. Keefe,Rolf R. Engel,Stefan Leucht
出处
期刊:Systematic Reviews [BioMed Central]
卷期号:12 (1) 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13643-023-02213-5
摘要

Abstract Background There is evidence that antipsychotic drugs differ in their effect on the cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. So far, there is no comprehensive systematic review available that would enable providers and patients to make informed choices regarding this important aspect of treatment. With a large number of substances available, conventional pairwise meta-analyses will not be sufficient to inform this choice. To fill this gap, we will conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA), integrating direct and indirect comparisons from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to rank antipsychotics according to their effect on cognitive functioning. Methods In our NMA, we will include RCTs in patients with schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like psychoses comparing one antipsychotic agent with another antipsychotic agent or placebo that measures cognitive function. We will include studies on patients of every age group, in any phase of illness (e.g., acute or stable, first episode or chronic schizophrenia, in- or outpatients) with an intervention time of at least 3 weeks. The primary outcome will be the composite score of cognitive functioning, preferentially measured with the test battery developed by the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative. The secondary outcomes include the seven cognitive domains that the composite score is composed of, as well as functioning and quality of life. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by at least two independent reviewers. We will use the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 to determine the risk of bias in studies, and we will evaluate the confidence in the results using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). We will perform NMA using R (package netmeta). We will conduct subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore the heterogeneity and assess the robustness of our findings. Discussion This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to inform evidence-based antipsychotic treatment choice for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia patients by analyzing existing RCTs on this subject. The results have the potential to support patients’ and physicians’ decision-making processes based on the latest available evidence. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022312483
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
刚刚
称心小蜜蜂完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
2秒前
WatsonJiang完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lwt完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助生菜采纳,获得10
3秒前
君子扑火完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
Leo_Sun完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
liuzhudi完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
瑞瑞刘发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Queen发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
CPUPPer发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
花城发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
研友_bZzO08完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
大力契应助hhh采纳,获得10
7秒前
学术z完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
敏感板栗完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
立追拓发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
小青椒应助我爱科研采纳,获得20
8秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
慕青应助含蓄安南采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
完美世界应助溜溜梅采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助YunZeng采纳,获得10
11秒前
珍惜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
珍惜发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
MM完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
11秒前
开朗发卡完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
ZZZ完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Tim完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
罗晨完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
小蘑菇应助有魅力的千青采纳,获得10
13秒前
学术z发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart 1500
Cowries - A Guide to the Gastropod Family Cypraeidae 1200
“Now I Have My Own Key”: The Impact of Housing Stability on Recovery and Recidivism Reduction Using a Recovery Capital Framework 500
PRINCIPLES OF BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS Microeconomics & Human Behavior 400
The Red Peril Explained: Every Man, Woman & Child Affected 400
The Social Work Ethics Casebook(2nd,Frederic G. Reamer) 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5024848
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4261857
关于积分的说明 13283326
捐赠科研通 4069040
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2225559
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1234214
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1158226