Submillisievert Abdominal Photon-Counting CT versus Energy-integrating Detector CT for Urinary Calculi Detection: Impact on Diagnostic Confidence

Background Contrast-unenhanced abdominal CT is the imaging standard for urinary calculi detection; however, studies comparing photon-counting detector (PCD) CT and energy-integrating detector (EID) CT dose-reduction potentials are lacking. Purpose To compare the radiation dose and image quality of optimized EID CT with those of an experimental PCD CT scan protocol including tin prefiltration in patients suspected of having urinary calculi. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study included patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal PCD CT or EID CT for suspected urinary caliculi between February 2022 and March 2023. Signal and noise measurements were performed at three anatomic levels (kidney, psoas, and obturator muscle). Nephrolithiasis and/or urolithiasis presence was independently assessed by three radiologists, and diagnostic confidence was recorded on a five-point scale (1, little to no confidence; 5, complete confidence). Reader agreement was determined by calculating Krippendorff α. Results A total of 507 patients (mean age, 51.7 years ± 17.4 [SD]; 317 male patients) were included (PCD CT group, 229 patients; EID CT group, 278 patients). Readers 1, 2, and 3 detected nephrolithiasis in 129, 127, and 129 patients and 94, 94, and 94 patients, whereas the readers detected urolithiasis in 113, 114, and 114 patients and 152, 153, and 152 patients in the PCD CT and EID CT groups, respectively. Regardless of protocol (PCD CT or EID CT) or calculus localization, near perfect interreader agreement was found (α ≥ 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99, 1). There was no evidence of a difference in reader confidence between PCD CT and EID CT (median confidence, 5; IQR, 5-5;