Peripheral nerve stimulation for saphenous neuralgia

Background Injury to saphenous nerve branches is frequent during knee surgery and can result in chronic pain. This saphenous neuralgia remains challenging to treat. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a new potential non-pharmacologic treatment option. We present our outcomes experience using this technology in 12 patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed PNS placement for saphenous neuralgia between 2000 and 2022 at a single institution. Demographic information was collected as well as response to the device. Four-question short-form Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scores were collected before and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months postprocedure. Specific scores included pain interference and behavior, functional mobility, depression, anxiety, and sleep impairment. Change in pain interference measured by the short-form PROMIS tool at 6 months was chosen as the primary outcome. Results Twelve patients met inclusion criteria, with 10 patients having the full 6-month follow-up. In these 10 patients, the mean change from baseline in the short-form adjusted pain interference score (greater difference means improved pain) at 6 months was 5.8 (SD 6.5). Among all patients, average follow-up was 11.5 months (range 3–35 months). Most patients’ symptoms developed after knee surgery (84%). Prior to PNS, patients underwent other treatments including cryoablation (8%), radiofrequency ablation (16%), saphenous neurectomy (16%), or surgical release of adjacent nerves (25%). Ten patients (83%) reported any improvement in symptoms while two reported no benefit. Complications occurred in four patients (33%). Two patients had the device removed and a third discontinued use. PROMIS Scores for pain, functional mobility, mood, and sleep impairment all improved. Discussion Limited effective treatments exist for saphenous neuralgia. Our case series demonstrates the potential of PNS as a treatment for saphenous neuralgia. Comparative effectiveness studies are warranted to assess whether our effect size is clinically relevant.