Comparison of the Accuracy of Modified CT Severity Index Score and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Assessing the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

医学 急性胰腺炎 胰腺炎 放射性武器 急诊科 疾病严重程度 放射科 内科学 中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率 金标准(测试) 淋巴细胞 精神科
作者
Hasan Tahir,Sheeraz Rahman,Zahid Habib,Yusra Shafaat khan,Saleha Shehzad
出处
期刊:Cureus [Cureus, Inc.]
卷期号:13 (8): e17020-e17020 被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.7759/cureus.17020
摘要

Background Acute pancreatitis is an acute gastrointestinal emergency with significant morbidity and mortality if not treated. It can lead to local as well as systemic complications and has a prevalence of 51.07%. Laboratory investigations such as amylase and lipase and ultrasound scan are typically used for the diagnosis. A contrast-enhanced CT scan is considered the gold standard. Both laboratory and radiological investigation-based scoring systems have been reported in the literature and are in practice. However, these modalities demand several laboratory investigations and are expensive. Our study aims to determine the congruency of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the modified CT severity index score (MCTSI) with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. In addition, the accuracy of NLR and MCTSI is determined. The secondary objective is to determine whether NLR can predict the severity of acute pancreatitis to the same extent as MCTSI through expensive radiological imaging and other clinical scoring systems through a list of investigations. Methodology The data for this study were collected retrospectively and patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included through the nonprobability convenience sampling method. All patients underwent relevant laboratory workup (including complete blood count) and radiological workup (including CT scan) during their hospital stay. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR and MCTSI, and the congruency of these with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. Results A total of 166 patients with acute pancreatitis were included, of which 107 (64.45%) were males and 59 (35.55%) were females, with a mean age of 43.7. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR were 67%, 90.9%, and 76%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MCTSI were 95%, 13.6%, and 62%, respectively. The area under the curve for NLR was 0.855 whereas that for MCTSI was determined to be 0.645. Conclusions NLR has a good concordance with the revised Atlanta classification and assesses the disease severity, especially in moderate-to-severe cases of acute pancreatitis compared to MCTSI. In addition, NLR can be used in acute and/or resource-poor settings to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
hmgdktf发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
义气豌豆发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
魔幻的小蘑菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
诚心瑛完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
英俊的铭应助言简采纳,获得10
4秒前
研友_7ZeNx8完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
KK发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
5秒前
JiangY完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
一期一发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
安详的斓完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
oui发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
天天天蓝发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
舒心师完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Steve发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
天际小山完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
pluto应助小李攻攻采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
YuanyueWang完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
hmgdktf完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
蘑菇也是植物关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
clearlove完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
001发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
荒天帝发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
CipherSage应助baiyang99采纳,获得10
16秒前
Aypnia发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
LXN发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
小牛同志发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
123456完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
无机发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
天天快乐应助YuanyueWang采纳,获得10
18秒前
yinlao完成签到,获得积分0
19秒前
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Lewis’s Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Comprehensive Textbook Sixth Edition 2000
Continuing Syntax 1000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Work • Third edition • 2025 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 510
Pharma R&D Annual Review 2026 500
荧光膀胱镜诊治膀胱癌 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6219425
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8044603
关于积分的说明 16768343
捐赠科研通 5305489
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2826402
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1804569
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1664387